Thursday, March 31, 2016

April Movie Preview

Traditionally, August has been a month set aside for summer movies that don't fit anywhere else. There's room for one or two hits and the rest get buried amidst weeks of 5-6 nationwide releases. It looks like April is in a similar position. Thanks to blockbusters like the Fast and Furious movies, studios have proof that audiences will show up in April for the right movie, and early year successes like Deadpool, Zootopia, and Batman v. Superman giving 2016 no downtime to speak of, this April is full of movies with a lot of potential. There's several sequels to modest hits, what looks like another comedy hit for Melissa McCarthy, and another remake of a Disney classic. Normally, there's a week or two in April that leaves me struggling to find something to watch. That will no be the case in 2016.

2016
Jan | Feb | Mar  
2015
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | Jul | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec 
2014
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2013
Mar |  Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec


4/1
Meet the Blacks
Working For It: If you couldn't get enough of Scary Movie or A Haunted House or any of those awful parodies, here's one for The Purge. Mike Epps takes the role that I assume a Wayans brother was too busy to fill as the father of a black family moving into an affluent neighborhood in a world that has a Purge. It's definitely a funny pitch.
Working Against It: The Purge is already so laughably over the top that making a parody of it is too easy. Seriously, nothing in the preview would be out of place in the real movies, save a few self-aware jokes. This is the kind of movie that I wouldn't see with a free ticket and snacks provided.
Verdict: I'll hopefully never see it

God's Not Dead 2
Working For It: Damn, that's an intriguing title. I almost watched the first one out of sheer curiosity. It actually seems like a more interesting angle for there spiritual movies than the standard "miracle happens" or "town is saved by Christian virtues" setups. I'm not sure how the sequel will be any different from the first (I recognize much more of the cast though), but does that matter?
Working Against It: I can forgive a lot of things, but refusing to call this God's Still Not Dead is inexcusable.
Verdict: Maybe on Netflix if I'm reeeealy bored.

Everybody Wants Some!! [Limited]
Working For It: A 1980's Dazed and Confused centered around a college baseball team. Yeah, Richard Linklater is back at it! It's hard to tell if this is him retreating to something that he knows or further developing something he's done before (certainly, the latter case sounds much more like him). Regardless, I'm on board. The cast looks like one of those that's filled with people I can't name now but will be able to in a decade. Just watch the trailer and tell me you don't think there's another Matthew McConaughey in there somewhere.
Working Against It: I worry that at some point with Richard Linklater, the experiment will matter more than the quality of the project. It's worked so far in the Before series. Some might argue that Boyhood was the tipping point (the story of the production is much more interesting than the actual movie).
Verdict: Good chance I'll see it in theaters

Kill Your Friends [Limited]
Working For It: Nicholas Hoult is some sort of recording agent/serial murderer. This has a major American Psycho vibe and its success really will come down to how you answer the next question: Can Nicholas Hoult be the next Christian Bale?
Working Against It: I worry about any movie that is called a cult movie before it's released. It's like someone trying to make a viral video. It doesn't work like that. Cult movies are reactions, not a genre.
Verdict: Likely to be a permanent fixture in my Netflix queue that I'll never get around to

Miles Ahead [Limited]
Working For It: Don Cheadle's directorial debut. He also stars (and cowrote the screenplay) as Miles Davis in a biopic, set later in his career, that looks back at his past. I like Don Cheadle and I'm always interested to see when actors make the jump to director. Sometimes, it's the beginning of a whole new phase of their career. Other times, it's this weird, one-off experiment.
Working Against It: I don't know much about Miles Davis and it's been a while since I saw a biopic about a musician that didn't underwhelm me. The preview has a bit of a The End of the Tour vibe except it embraces the eccentricities of the main subject more. I'll probably wait on this for reviews and word of mouth.
Verdict:I might Netflix it

4/8
Before I Wake
Working For It: The woman from Blue Crush (Kate Bosworth) and the guy from Hung (Thomas Jane) adopt the kid from Room (Jacob Tremblay) who has nightmares that cause butterflies and demons to happen.
Working Against It: I don't really understand what the conflict is all about. I tend to like my horror either starkly realistic and batshit crazy. This looks like it's something in between. I don't care much for half-measues.
Verdict: Probably never seeing it

The Boss
Working For It: Melissa McCarthy is a Paula Deen-type who gets out of jail after going for insider trading. Broke and out of options, she begins a Girl Scout Cookie empire. It looks big and zany and just right for what McCarthy does well. There's also people like Kristen Bell, Peter Dinklage, and Cecily Strong who I like a lot.
Working Against It: The last time McCarthy's husband, Ben Falcone, wrote and directed a movie was Tammy which was a mess of a movie. What I've determined though, is that when McCarthy is given a character that is good at what she does (Bridesmaids, The Heat, Spy), it's a pretty good movie. When she's just playing an oaf with no redeemable skills (Identity Thief, Tammy), I don't care for the movie. The Boss looks more like the former than the latter. Then again, the good Melissa McCarthy movies were also all her movies with Paul Feig, so maybe that's the missing link. What I'm trying to say is, I'm probably seeing this movie, but I don't know what to expect.
Verdict: Opening week

Hardcore Henry
Working For It: This is a first-person action movie which, as an idea, is intriguing as hell. A lot of people are dismissing it with glib comments about already owning [insert first person shooter video game title], and that's fair. I'm a sucker for found footage movies. This is the next logical step, so I'm pretty interested to see how this turns out.
Working Against It: This might be the shaky-cam movie that finally puts me over the edge and makes me sick. That's a small concern. Otherwise, I only recognize two cast members (Sharlto Copley - the Neill Blomkamp muse, and Tim Roth) and it's from an unproven director. I'm heard something about reshoots as well that's made me worry that the final product might be pretty rough.
Verdict: I'll definitely see it, maybe in theaters

Demolition [Limited]
Working For It: As far as I can tell, this is Jake Gyllenhaal starring in Everything Must Go meets Punch Drunk Love. I like all three of those things, so that's a good start. Gyllenhaal is a man who just lost his wife and goes about systematically destroying everything he has to try to process his grief or lack thereof. Along the way, he meets Naomi Watts, who works for a vending machine company that he wrote complaints to. I can't tell if the trailers are holding something back or if there isn't much more to the story than that.
Working Against It: There's a wide margin of error for this kind of movie. It could be great, or it could be wallowing and overly self-reflective, confusing big acting for meaningful emotions. I just don't know. It sounds like the definitive, half-drunk, watching Netflix kind of movie.
Verdict:A lock for Netflix

Mr. Right [Limited]
Working For It: Anna Kendrick falls in love with a hit man played by Sam Rockwell. In other words, this is either Killers with a better cast or Mr. and Mrs. Smith with a less famous cast. Either way, I love Kendrick and Rockwell. Writer Max Landis also penned American Ultra which looks to pair nicely with Mr. Right.
Working Against It: There's a lot of comedies that I appreciate the levity of but don't actually find funny at all. That looks like this in a nutshell. And, I think we can officially call that story a stale idea at this point.
Verdict: Netflix, for sure

4/15
Barbershop: The Next Cut
Working For It: The Barbershop franchise is easy. Ice Cube can make as many of these as he wants without needing to worry about diminished returns. The Next Cut brings all the regulars back, welcomes in the Beauty Shop ladies, and adds a few new comic actors. The end result will be the same laid back feel with a couple detours into higher stakes.
Working Against It: Those trailers and TV spots sure are repetitive with the same jokes. I sure hope that's because they don't want to ruin the better jokes, not that those are the strong ones they're using to pull in an audience.
Verdict: Doubtful that I'll ever see it

Criminal
Working For It: Ryan Reynolds' mind is put into Kevin Costner. Costner must try to unlock his secrets in order to save the world or something. Ryan Reynolds has never been hotter thanks to Deadpool and I keep waiting for another Kevin Costner movie to break big. It feels like we're due a comeback, doesn't it? Gary Oldman's there too. And Gal Gadot and Alice Eve. Tommy Lee Jones. Michael Pitt. I assumed this was a throwaway project, but it has the cast of a superhero movie*.
Working Against It: Self/Less just came out. Is Ryan Reynolds trolling Hollywood or something? It's like he knows that he's too handsome, talented, and funny to not get another movie role, so he actively tries to halt his career momentum whenever he can. Why is he making the same movie he was in a year ago?
Verdict: Unlikely that I'll ever see it

*Literally. By my count, I've get Deadpool, Wonder Woman, Two-Face, Superman's dad, Commissioner Gordon. Quite frankly, I'm shocked that Michael Pitt hasn't been a super villain or Alive Eve hasn't been the reporter/scientist love interest in a movie yet.

The Jungle Book
Working For It: Jon Favreau assembles an all-star voice cast for a live action remake of the classic movie/book. Visually, the movie looks great, and I'm among the many excited for Bill Murray as Baloo. In the same way that missing Cinderalla last year was never an option, it won't be for The Jungle Book either.
Working Against It: Thanks to my Club 50 project, I've seen more than my fair share of Jungle Book movies recently.
Verdict: I'll see you there opening weekend

Colonia [Limited]
Working For It: Emma Watson joins the Colonia Dignidad community in search of her boyfriend. Check out the wikipedia page. I'm guessing things don't go well. Watson is enough to get my interest. It's got Daniel Bruhl too, who was excellent in Rush.
Working Against It: Watson's post Harry Potter career has been more about finding interesting roles than great movies. This fits that mold. The trailer didn't really pull me in the way I think it was meant to.
Verdict: Probably eventually

Green Room [Limited]
Working For It: A punk band has to survive against a group of skinheads after witnessing a murder. The leader the the skinheads: Patrick Stewart. That sounds just crazy enough to be interesting. It's also got Alia Shawkat (Maeby from Arrested Development) and Imogen Poots (from, uh, Need for Speed). Oh, and Anton Yelchin. Another Star Trek alum.
Working Against It: There's a lot of versions of this movie that I wouldn't like. If it revels in the violence too much, for example, I'll pass. I haven't seen any of Jeremy Saulnier's other movies, so I don't know what to expect.
Verdict: I'll be looking for it on Netflix

4/22
Elvis & Nixon
Working For It: You know that picture of Nixon and Elvis. The awkward one. Imagine a comedy movie about that day with Kevin Spacey playing Nixon and Michael Shannon as Elvis. Sounds fun, right? It has a pretty solid supporting cast too, with Colin Hanks, Alex Pettyfer, Evan Peters, and Ashley Benson.
Working Against It: I think this will come down to people's response to Shannon's Elvis. I got tired of it just from the trailer, so that's a bad sign.
Verdict: I already forgot about this movie

The Huntsman Winter's War
Working For It: I guess no one told the actors that Snow White and the Huntsman wasn't that big of a hit. Maybe it was the success of Frozen, or a killer idea, or perhaps Universal just had nearly everyone still under contract, but here we are, with a sequel (or prequel, I think) with only a tenuous connection to the first movie. I respect the absurd amount of star power here. In addition to bringing back Charlize Theron and Chris Hemsworth, they got Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain to join. This is a textbook example of how casting can overcome any creative worries I have about a movie.
Working Against It: It's rare that a movie of this profile gets a better cast. Maybe you could argue that Kristen Stewart's appeal trumps Blunt's and Chastain's, but that a very 2012 mindset. Looking at the trailer, the franchise has been retooled for the sequel with a flimsier story. Also, I can't be the only one bothered by a movie that is so clearly highlighting its female characters is named for the one, fairly uninteresting male lead.
Verdict: It would take stunningly bad reviews to scare me away from it.


A Hologram for the King [Limited]
Working For It: Tom Hanks goes through a midlife crisis that leads him to the Middle East to sell hologram technology to a king or sultan or someone. Hanks must've really like working with Tom Tykwer on Cloud Atlas.
Working Against It: While watching the trailer, I kept feeling like there's something about the movie that its hiding. It looks like a pretty standard Eat, Pray, Love movie. It's something a little weirder though. I'm probably wrong though, so that's why I'll pass on this initially.
Verdict: Right after I get to Larry Crown

The Meddler [Limited]
Working For It: This is the WASP mom's response to The Guilt Trip. Susan Sarandon is a recent widow who is overbearing in her daughter's (Rose Byrne) life until she start dating motor cyclist (J.K. Simmons). I'm really not sure what the plot is supposed to be, but with those three and a deep roster of supporting characters (Trust me. There's too many to list), I don't need to know much else.
Working Against It: Is it possible that Susan Saradon can do too good of a job in this? I'm already kind of annoyed by her character from a two minute trailer. I know that's the point. Hopefully this is a case of the movie putting it in better context, but I'm not sure I want to risk the price of a ticket to find out. I do like Rose Byne though...
Verdict: Eventually

4/29
Keanu
Working For It: Key & Peele. Adorable cat. Gang fights. What more do you need?
Working Against It: Answer: nothing.
Verdict: Maybe I should pre-order my ticket now

Mother's Day
Working For It: Sometimes, you just want to see Jennifer Aniston, Britt Robertson, Kate Hudson, Julia Roberts, Timothy Olyphant, Jason Sudeikis, Sarah Chalke, Shay Mitchell, Christine Lakin, Margo Martindale, Jon Lovitz, and Aasif Mandvi in a movie together.
Working Against It: Sometimes, Jennifer Aniston, Britt Robertson, Kate Hudson, Julia Roberts, Timothy Olyphant, Jason Sudeikis, Sarah Chalke, Shay Mitchell, Christine Lakin, Margo Martindale, Jon Lovitz, and Aasif Mandvi in a movie isn't enough to make you want to see it.
Verdict: Not in theaters but I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't get to it eventually

Ratchet & Clank
Working For It: It's a popular game series and this looks like it's full of kid jokes.
Working Against It: I am not a kid and I never played the games.
Verdict: Definitely not in theaters. Hopefully not after that.

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Delayed Reaction: Space Station 3D

The Pitch: Not only is this in IMAX. It's in 3D too!
How I Came Into It: Like the other couple IMAX movies I've gone through, this was a slow burn. It's holds the dubious distinction of being the highest grossing movie to never get in the top 10 in the box office.

Why I Saw It: (Club 50) It's just cool to see actual shots from the International Space Station on an IMAX camera. It's a live-action documentary short. There doesn't need to be much more to it than that.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: What, am I going to ding it for being a educational film that's pretty dull beyond the pretty footage? Yes. Yes I am. Ding!

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Club 50 Wrap-Up: 2001

Years Completed:
19891995 | 2001 | 2003 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

The year 2001 was the start of something big. Coming off a rather humdrum 2000, the studios were all ready for the next phase. By my count, 2001 alone started 6 major franchises, many of which have defined Hollywood ever since. There was the first Harry Potter movie (8 movies, $2.4 billion domestic, $7.7 billion worldwide, with the Fantastic Beasts series still to come), which passed James Bond as the biggest franchise of all time (not adjusted for inflation). Then there's the largest animated franchise ever that got it's start that year: Shrek* (4 films, not to mention Puss in Boots, $1.27 billion domestic, $3.96 billion worldwide). Lord of the Rings, which took over the world with its initial trilogy ($1.04 billion domestic, $2.92 billion worldwide) and still did quite well with The Hobbit movies ($820 million domestic, $2.94 billion worldwide). Oh, and I haven't even gotten to arguably the most important franchise: a little movie called The Fast and the Furious (7 movies, $1.29 billion domestic, $3.9 billion worldwide), that just had its biggest movie in 2015, 5th highest grossing movie of all time. No one would've predicted that in 2001. Ocean's Eleven and Spy Kids each had multiple sequels as well as attempted reboots. This was such a huge year and even bigger in hindsight.

*Let it be know that with the fifth installment coming up, Ice Age will, somehow, pass Shrek worldwide, but for now, this counts.

While only 7 of the movies in the top 50 in 2001 were sequels, 20 of them have had sequels since. Perhaps more telling, 15 of the top 17 movies are the ones who have had sequels. Studios chased those successes hard.

With all these franchises dominating the box office, there wasn't nearly as much room for the Oscar players. Only 3 of the 5 nominees for Best Picture showed up in the top 50 (A Beautiful Mind, The Return of the King, Moulin Rouge!). It is worth noting that Gosford Park (#59) and In the Bedroom (#66) weren't far out thanks to the Oscar bump.

To wind down each year as I complete them, I'm going to hand out a few superlatives or anecdotal awards to highlight some of the highs and lows of the year's top 50 box office earners.

First Seen: Jurassic Park III
I can't be fair about this movie. I've seen it one time, in theaters. That day, I got my braces put on then went to Outback Steakhouse, where my teeth hurt too much to eat much of anything then went to see this movie but again, my teeth hurt too much to get any snacks. I don't remember much about the movie, just the hate I feel for that day.

Last Seen: Spy Game
Could that title be any more generic? No wonder I didn't realize I hadn't seen it yet.

Happiest Surprise: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
This is an almost impossible decision. It came down to two movies: Ocean's Eleven and The Fellowship of the Ring. Ocean's Eleven I saw on video with my family and was incredibly impressed. I remember thinking there's no way that the master plan could hold up under scrutiny. It's now one of my favorite movies of all top (in my top 10, easy). Despite that, few movies have ever blown me away like The Fellowship of the Ring. It was like my Star Wars. I just couldn't believe that movie existed.

Biggest Disappointment: The Others
There weren't a lot of good movies to choose from for this. It was basically The Others or The Royal Tennebaums. While The Royal Tenebaums began my continued perplexion over the critical love affair for Wes Anderson (Seriously, I don't get his movies), I had to go with The Others. This wasn't that far removed from The Sixth Sense, so I was looking too hard for the twist. When that didn't impress me, that moved the movie into disappointment territory.

Looked Better Then: The Mummy Returns
Good god, those Scorpion King graphics. Those look awful now. Distractingly awful.

Looks Better Now: The Fast and the Furious
You could really go for any of the movies I mentioned that spawned empires, but let's be honest, only one of those is the correct choice. Who would've guessed that this Point Break rip-off would still be going, 15 years later and be bigger than ever? Like, taking over the world big.

Favorite: Ocean's Eleven
I can't say enough good things about this movie. It's one of my favorite ever. Steven Soderbergh assembled an absurdly good cast who all are having a blast. The script is funny, clever, and underplayed. I can't think of a movie that I've quoted more than this one. It's almost beside the point that the plan for the heist is actually well structured. I love this movie. I think I'm going to watch it again right now.

2nd Favorite: A Knight's Tale
You see, 2001 is a special year for me. Not only is Ocean's Eleven one of my very favorite movies. A Knight's Tale is too. The mix of Heath Leger, HBO replay ubiquity, and poetic quotability have forever burned this into my heart/soul/brain. I'm not a great memorizer, but there's been times when I could quote all of Chaucer's speeches. I love the hell out of this movie. Virtually any other year, this would been my top pick.

3rd Favorite: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
If I was picking the most important movie, this would be the no question pick. This is “only” my third favorite Lord of The Rings movie and my first two picks are all timers, so third will have to do.

Honorable Mention:
Rat Race
It's a stupid movie, but I love it.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
I've long said that they should've waited until all the books were written before doing these movies. Despite that, they started the franchise impressively, with spot on casting.

Legally Blonde
Another reason why Reese Witherspoon is too delightful to hate.

A Beautiful Mind
If nothing else, I'm glad that it finally got Ron Howard his Oscar.

The Princess Diaries
There's a good chance that without this movie, I wouldn't know who Anne Hathaway is. That makes this movie vital.

Least Favorite: Scary Movie 2
I hate this franchise in general and this one is the worst of them all. The first movie had a clear direction ("spoof Scream"). The third gave into the anarchy of the parody. Scary Movie 2 lacked either of those guidances and was 90% filler. I'm glad that these movies aren't the only thing Anna Faris is known for.

Delayed Reaction: Spy Game

The Pitch: Robert Redford is a CIA agent who just can't retire until he saves Brad Pitt, one of his spies.
How I Came Into It: I was expecting something more adversarial between Redford and Pitt. I'm not sure why, exactly. I don't remember this movie coming out at all.

Why I Saw It: (Club 50) I like when Robert Redford treats being in a movie like he's doing it a favor. He knows what he needs to give for this role. He's not going to do anything more than that. It's up to the director or production as a whole to elevate the rest of it. This is only slightly different from the "movie star" move of "do what you do and expect the production to work around you" (i.e. Will Smith).

Why I Wish I Hadn't: The downside to Redford's approach is that the whole movie felt disinterested. There was no sense of stakes the whole time. It's wasn't a heady movie either. A lot of people were going through the motions. I get the sense that the end is supposed to be more Usual Suspects than it was.

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

Monday, March 28, 2016

Delayed Reaction: A Low Down Dirty Shame

The Pitch: A Wayans brother does action hero-y stuff and comedy stuff.
How I Came Into It: I like the Wayans brothers (I think there's a sister or two out there too). They are likable. All of them. It's eerie. Where's the one they try to hide? I want to see that one.

Why I Saw It: (Club 50) Kennen Ivory Wayans is as good as any of his brothers. He's convincing enough as the action hero. Jada Pinkett-Smith steals the show though. She's jolt of energy every time she's on camera.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: Nothing about it was exceptional. It wasn't notably exciting, funny, romantic, mysterious, or anything. Like, I'd watch it again, but I'd never suggest it.

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

Sunday, March 27, 2016

Movie Reaction: Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice

Formula: (Man of Steel + The Dark Knight Rises)!

At what point do superhero movies assume that audience already knows the character?

I found myself asking that a lot while watching Batman vs. Superman (which I'm going to call BvS from here on). Batman and Superman are the two most iconic superheroes in the world. If you go up to a person on the street and ask that person, he or she could tell you things like Batman's parents were killed or Superman is an alien. Even the casual movie-goer who would see one of these movies would know Lex Luthor and Alfred or recognize Wonder Woman from just the outfit. Zack Snyder knows that, but it is a good thing?

BvS picks up a little while after Man of Steel and continues with the same questions and themes as that movie. Should the world fear Superman? Does Superman owe anything to the world? From the opening moments though, it asks these questions from a different perspective. There's this Bruce Wayne guy who also believes in doing the right thing. Only, he has some different and more brutal tactics, not to mention, he's only a man. Mr. Wayne sees the closing battle in Man of Steel the way many audiences did: As a needless, deadly disaster. Thousands of people died because more powerful beings got in a fight. I don't know if it was always the intent, but Snyder and Co. take the carnage in Man of Steel and only talk about it as a tragedy in BvS. It's funny that BvS lost the game of chicken with Civil War, because by moving to an earlier date, it gets to be the first to ask a lot of the same questions as Civil War about superhero accountability.

Bruce Wayne, played by Ben Affleck in this iteration, ends up with the same idea as energetic and eccentric billionaire Lex Luther (Jesse Eisenberg): figure out a way to stop Superman in case it's ever needed. They have different ways of doing this - fist-fights vs. domestic terrorism - but the end result is the same: No more Superman. Oh yeah, Superman is still being played by Henry Cavill, that super handsome guy who I keep forgetting what he looks like as soon as he's not on the screen.

So that's the movie. Lex Luthor and Batman - Bruce Wayne's alter-ego, but to my earlier point, you already knew that - try to beat Superman while Superman tries to figure out who he should be to the world. And, off on the side, Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman stars in a 15 minute short film that is way more interesting than the rest of the movie, and Amy Adams finds something to do, because you don't cast Amy Adams and not use her.

Quite frankly, I liked the movie. I didn't love it. It didn't change my mind about anything DC is doing. In fact, it confirmed my fears that DC tried to do too much with this movie. It shorted every character of the spotlight he or she needed to be real characters. It leaned far too heavily on the audience already knowing the beats: what motivates Bruce Wayne, what motivates Lex Luthor, what are Batman's ethics, etc (These are never explained. The film assumes you already know). The end result is a movie that rushes through everything. I'd rather not pick at the story, because I'm not sure how much of it actually makes sense. There's effort made to excuse the mayhem caused by the fighting this time, but it's still over the top. The geography of how characters got from place to place baffled me. There's a lot about BvS that you could go after if you want.

But, again, I liked it. Ben Affleck is a good Batman. He's got the handsome thing down yet I can also see him getting dirty. This is a more brutal Batman than we've seen before, which works very well for this world. I'm amazed at how anonymous Henry Cavill still feels, making him an ideal Superman. Jesse Eisenberg lays the groundwork for Lex Luthor nicely, although there isn't enough time to see what makes him tick. Gal Gadot is strategically underused, which works nicely for the big reveal [that the trailer already ruined]. I can't wait to see more of her in the role. Amy Adams is probably too good for this Lois Lane role. That doesn't stop me from being happy any time she's on screen.

The cast is nice, but my deciding factor is the action. Zack Snyder really deserves to be paired with Michael Bay more often for their shared love of big things: fights, explosions, etc. I don't think he knows what it means to hold back and he embraces it here fully. You know, sometimes I just want to see Batman kick a room full of henchmen's asses or Superman and Wonder Woman double team an anonymous super-monster. And I want that scored to music that gets my heart racing with visual effects that takes an army to create. That's all I needed out of this movie, and that's all I got.

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Delayed Reaction: The ABCs of Death

The Pitch: 26 horror shorts from 26 directors, each assigned a letter of the alphabet.
How I Came Into It: I love the V/H/S movies and this series is often mentioned along with those as horror anthologies that get it right. I wanted a little dirty horror going into Halloween (yeah, I'm pretty far behind on posting these) so I decided to give this a try.

Why I Saw It: The good and bad thing with any anthology movie is that nothing lasts very long. There were a lot of clever and inventive and twisted and funny stories. I really should've watched this a lot earlier at night and less drunk because the many, many stories all run together, making it hard top pick any standouts.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: A number of these went more for laughs than scares. I understand that the reactions are quite similar (both rely heavily on surprise), but I wasn't really looking to laugh when I watched this.

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Club 50 Wrap Up: 1995

Years Completed:
1989 | 1995 | 2003 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

1995 was a good year for movies. It lacked the number of all-time great movies like 1994 (Forrest Gump, Pulp Fiction, and The Shawshank Redemption, which was actually #51 that year, thus not eligible for Club 50 recognition). It made up for it in depth and originality. Only seven of the 50 were sequels. Not including video-only releases. Only 11 movies have had sequels since.

It was a good year for Oscar nominees, as four of the five movies (Braveheart, Apollo 13, Babe, Sense and Sensibility) made the top 50. Only Il Postino didn't make the cut, which is expected for a foreign movie in any era of the American box office.

The most noticibale trend from that year is the nature of the kid's movies. Compared to now, it seems like more of the successful movies were geared toward kids and there was much more variety. Today, it's mainly a handful of CG movies. In 1995, Toy Story started that by being the first fully CGI movie ever released and ended up being the highest grossing movie that year. Disney was still in the Renaissance with the classically animated Pocahontas. Live action movies like Casper and Jumanji also made the top ten. Babe was a G-rated family movie that managed to pull an Oscar nomination. There's the Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers' jump to the big screen. Remember The Indian in the Cupboard? Yeah, that made it too.

To wind down each year as I complete them, I'm going to hand out a few superlatives or anecdotal awards to highlight some of the highs and lows of the year's top 50 box office earners.

First Seen: Pocahontas
It's hard to be certain before about 2005, when I started keeping my movie stubs, but this is the first released of the movies that I'm pretty certain I saw in theaters.

Last Seen: Higher Learning
This kept falling through the cracks until I hard nothing else left. It was worth the wait - No, that's not right...It was worth waiting for. - No, still wrong...Last is about right for when I watched this...I didn't care for it.

I was prepared for this to go very badly. I figured it was one of those movies that was forward thinking at the time and has since fallen hopelessly behind. Sure, it's dated, but it holds up a lot better than I expected.

Biggest Disappointment: Waterworld
It was hard to find a real disappointment in this top 50. I didn't want to pick Waterworld because it's too easy. It's one of the great examples of squandered clout. Kevin Costner was on top of the world after Dances with Wolves and a string of other successes. Then he made this, which was a production nightmare, super expensive, and not worth it at all.

Looked Better Then: The Net
This has not aged at all well. That's all I'll say.

Looks Better Now: Toy Story
There's a couple good candidates here. Se7en was the movie that put David Fincher on the map. Clueless has aged incredibly well (Good writing is good writing). Only one move can be called "revolutionary" though. At the time, we suspected that computer animation was the wave of the future. So, even if we ignore that, we couldn't've known at the time that this would be the begining of one of the most remarkable strings of success by a studio (16 movies in a row that have all made over $160 million - That's insane).

Favorite: Toy Story
I've seen this movie more times than I can count. It's funny. It's smart. It's sentimental. The characters are iconic. Pixar could not have made a better debut than this classic.

2nd Favorite: Clueless
This is still Amy Heckerling's crowning achievement. The older I get, the more I appreciate how damn funny this is. Bonus points for introducing me to Paul Rudd (among many others, but he's the big one).

3rd Favorite: Nine Months
Apparently, this isn't as universally loved as it is by me. I don't know why. I've always liked Hugh Grant and this is him at his peak. There's Julianne Moore, Joan Cusack, Jeff Goldblum, Robin Williams, a funny Tom Arnold. How do you not laugh at the fight with the off-brand Barney or the hospital ride that keeps picking up injured people?

Honorable Mention:
Father of the Bride Part II
It had no business being as good as the original, yet it was.

GoldenEye
I cannot say how I'd feel about this movie without the video game. To me though, this is some great James Bond.

Se7en
David Fincher has directed so many great movies and this may still be his best.

The American President
I've watched this movie so many times. As The West Wing confirmed, this is the forum where Aaron Sorkin is most comfortable.

While You Were Sleeping
I just want Sandra Bullock to be happy.

I quite hated every minute of this. It was so boring. I didn't think I could dislike something with Meryl Streep and Clint Eastwood in it so much

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Delayed Reaction: About Schmidt

The Pitch: Jack Nicholson retires and then acts awful to almost anyone.
How I Came Into It: I've only ever heard one thing said about this and it's that Kathy Bates gets naked. That worries me on two levels. 1) I don't really care to see Kathy Bates naked, and more importantly 2) it means there's nothing more worth mentioning about it.

Why I Saw It: (Club 50) Jack Nicholson is great and it's a nice reminder of how unconsciously that man can be great. He makes it look easy. The ending in particular is quite sweet, with the letters and the drawing.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: You're gonna need to explain to me how this isn't Nebraska with a more cognizant lead. I'm not sure which one did it better, because I didn't particularly love either. Alexander Payne's movies have a tough time landing with me.

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

Monday, March 21, 2016

Movie Reaction: Allegiant

Formula: (The Maze Runner: Scorch Trials + The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 + The 5th Wave) / The Truman Show

Look, if they aren't going to try, then why should I?

I've been asking myself this as I've looked for a way to talk about this movie. Allegiant is the third film in the Divergent Series and it doesn't seem like anyone cares anymore.

I'm definitely of the opinion that there are too many movies like this and I only have myself to blame for seeing them all. There's a template that each series follows and any casual fan can be forgiven for confusing plot points from all of them.

Leaving off where Insurgent left off, Allegiant begins with the city of Chicago under mob rule. Jeanine is gone, so control of the city is left to a loose alliance between Evelyn (Naomi Watts) and Johanna (Octavia Spencer). Tensions are rising. Tris (Shailene Woodley) isn't interested in any of that. She wants to go outside the city walls. So, she manages to pick up all the actors worth mentioning - Four (Theo James), Christina (Zoe Kravitz), Peter (Miles Teller), Tori (Maggie Q) and Caleb (Ansel Elgort) - and escapes the city with only one fatality (hint: The only actor born before the Reagan administration). They quickly learn that a war decimated the outside world and that there's a futuristic society that has been watching all of them for their entire lives. Chicago is just one big experiment, testing for pure specimens. Tris is the first pure result ever, which means...something. This settlement is led by David (Jeff Daniels). Immediately, it's clear to everyone but Tris that something isn't right with him. I'll let you figure out the beats from there, because it isn't very hard. You've seen this movie or read this book before. You're either going to be drawn into this story or you're not. Nothing I can say about it will change your mind.

And, as much as I may gripe about the familiarity of the story, it's not what I had issue with. Here's my issue: No one is trying any more.

The dialogue is bad. Either someone pulled too much of the dialogue from the book without accounting for how it sounds out loud or the writing is just bad. I can't figure out which. There's one scene with all the characters in the rain. Every single line sounds like a competition to see who can say the most stereotypical thing before the scene ends. For god's sake, someone says "Gadzooks" and I don't think it was as a joke.

On a technical level, I think the ambition was greater than the budget. There's a lot of effects in this. A lot. There's a whole future world they had to make in this and none of it looks practical. Everything was designed thinking "what would look cool?" rather than "what would make sense?". Even that would be fine if it wasn't so obvious at times that they were standing in front of green screens. Without the dream sequences and virtual reality challenges from the first two movies, maybe I'm just noticing all that more and it's been like that all along. It was distracting though.

I'm burying the lead a little. The most alarming thing about this movie is that they took it away from Shailene Woodley. She's still technically the lead. Barely. I'd argue that this transitions to making Four the actual main character of the movie. He sure is the POV character a lot more. So, way to go. Now it's just another super-soldier action movie with a dreamy lead. Woodley spends half the movie showing up to kiss Theo James or be talked down to by Jeff Daniels. Such a waste. Speaking of wastes, Miles Teller is way too good for the role he's been given. He almost makes Peter seem like a fleshed out character, which is impressive given how little is on the page for him to do. I feel like the only direction that Ansel Elgort had for the entire movie was, "act like you're a broken person". And Zoe Kravitz. Another complete waste. I sure hope that character is more important in the books, because she could've been erased from all of her scenes and it would've made no difference. Kravitz is better than that.

I realize that I'm not reviewing Allegiant in any constructive way. I'm ok with that. This movie only exists because it's hard to fight inertia. One of the problems with these book series adaptations is that they are designed to tell one story over several movies. As long as the first movie does well enough, several more will be made. It's great when it's The Hunger Games. The first movie was a big hit. The second was an even bigger hit. The last two movies had drop offs, but there was enough momentum to finish with strength. Divergent has been declining since the first movie. If this was an original film series, Summit probably wouldn't've bothered with a third movie after the drop off in the second. Instead, it's going to limp through four movies, because 1-3 weren't made to stand alone at all. It's clear that by Allegiant, no one's heart is in it. It must suck to be trapped in a movie that isn't creatively or commercially successful. It's literally just a waste of time at this point.

So, yeah. See this movie because you might as well, or you like the cast, or for completism. Don't see it expecting it to get better.

Verdict (?): Strongly Don't Recommend