Not all sequels are built the same. They come from
different places. Most sequels these days are planned ahead of time. Some
trilogy or greater universe is mapped out and the success of the first
installment is assumed. If it's a Star Wars or a Harry Potter,
that works out. If it's a Golden Compass or an
Eragon, it doesn't. The
more traditional sequel is the result of an unplanned success. These are almost
all star-driven and rarely have a natural story to continue as a sequel. Look at
Legally Blonde or The Hangover as a good example. There's the
reboot sequel too, which tries to update a classic for a new generation but
keeps a connection to the original. Blade Runner and
Tron are great flag-bearers for that type. Probably the least successful of all sequels s what
I'd call the "concept sequel". That's when there's a story idea that
someone is convinced is the star of the movie, not the actors. I'm sure there
are a few successful examples of this, but all the ones that come to my mind
are not. Remember xXx: State of the Union, Smokin' Aces 2: Assassins'
Ball, or Cruel Intentions 2? The mighty Fast and the Furious
tried a concept sequel with Tokyo Drift and it nearly killed the
franchise.
Technically speaking, Pacific Rim: Uprising
is a reboot sequel since it brings back actors from the first movie, but
functionally, it is a concept sequel. The idea is that people want to see giant
robots fight giant monsters. The exacts of how are almost irrelevant. The first
Pacific Rim was fought above
its weight class. The credentials and resources behind it didn't match the
idea. It was a big swing for Legendary at the time. They gave Guillermo del
Toro (not an Oscar winner at the time but already treated like one) nearly $200
million to bring this big idea to life. It was meant to make a star out of
Charlie Hunnam and give Idris Elba the vehicle he needed to really become
"Movie Star Idris Elba" (still waiting on that to happen, but it was
worth a try). That film was an absolute treat because it was popcorn
entertainment under the enthusiastic care of an auteur.
Pacific Rim: Uprising is more like what I expected when I first heard the
description of Pacific Rim. Somewhat smaller budget. A less proven
director. Big-name producer helping it along. A couple fresh-faced stars. A bit
more targeted to a younger audience. This is a movie that feels like it exists
to sell toys much more than the first one. Although, let's be honest, both were
sold on the idea that these could make some pretty cool toys.
Set a decade after Pacific Rim, the world of Uprising
is mostly rebuilt for the carnage of the first film. The kaiju, the monsters
that came out of a dimensional portal in the Pacific Ocean are gone. The main
threat now is from people trying to make their own Jaegers (large robots
initially created to fight the kaiju). Jake (John Boyega) is the renegade son
of Stacker Pentecost (Idris Elba), the hero of the kaiju war who sacrificed
himself to save the planet. Jake has no desire to follow in his father's
footsteps, but a chance encounter with a young girl, Amara (Cailee Spaeny), who
built her own Jaeger leads to her being enrolled in the Jaeger pilot training
program and Jake being employed as an instructor at the training academy. Oh
yeah, I forgot to mention. Jake is a gifted Jaeger pilot. He's just running
away from that life because rebels gotta rebel. Jake butts heads with his old
frienemy Nate (Scott Eastwood), the senior instructor. Amara has trouble
fitting in with the other young pilots. Well, it turns out that the kaiju
aren't completely eradicated and all the named characters in this movie are
the only ones available to pilot Jaegers to stop them.
Look, the story is pretty basic. The more movies I
watch, the more I realize how much filmmakers rely on narrative shorthand to
make things work. If this was the first action movie I'd ever seen, the beats
of this wouldn't make much sense. Amara goes from outsider among the trainees
to de facto leader in about three scenes. But, I've seen a dozen movies about
training academies in which that exact thing happened, so I'm automatically
filling in the blanks to make that story work. The movie never really explains
why, at a massive Jaeger base, only two pilots and a handful of trainees are
the only ones available to fight the kaiju. I didn't really question it though,
because other movies have had stories about the A-team being sidelined so that
the reserves have to step up, I assume all the beats necessary to explain it happening
in this movie.
I remember hearing about a study that showed if you
keep the first and last letter of a word the same and jumble the letters in the
middle, you can still read the sentence because your brain unscrambles and
processes it automatically. That's kind of what happens with Uprising.
The screenplay isn't very good, but it fits more in it than it should be able
to because it assumes the audience already knows where everything is going
anyway. That means it can skip steps and still make sense.
The cast is reverse engineered for international
appeal. The pilot trainee class is a checklist of markets Universal is hoping
to appeal to (Russian, Chinese, American, etc.). The characters are mostly
playing types, and that's fine. Cailee Spaneny isn't a strength or liability in
the film. Going forward, she doesn't need to be the focus. Scott Eastwood is
making quite a career out of being a classic leading man in a world not looking
for a leading man. I think about his work in Uprising and The Fate of the Furious. He
gets put in movies to be anachronistic. He's there for the lead to say "We
don't need Captain America anymore". He's a good sport about it too
(probably because he knows that there's always going to be opportunities for a classic
leading man, even if it just takes a little longer to be handed a franchise
now). Charlie Day and Burn Gorman are back, this time not used as much for
laughs. That's a mistake, because, as much as I love Charlie Day, I can't take
him seriously in a movie like this. John Boyega largely carries the movie. I'm
not sure that he's ever going to be the "next big thing"-type of
star. I don't think he has it in him to lead a great movie by himself like a
Will Smith or a Tom Cruise. He is just what this movie needed though. He's able
to add levity to situations without taking away the stakes. If this movie was
too self-serious, it would be insufferable. He makes sure that doesn't happen.
He's still a bit young for me to buy into him in the mentor role. Give him
15-20 years and he'll be marvelous in that mode.
Have I really gone this long without talking about
the giant robots fighting the giant robots? Well, there's sort of a reason for
that. If all you need is for the action to be big and loud, then Uprising
is a success. It follows the sequel pattern of being bigger and louder than
before. However, I wasn't as enamored this time. I spent most of the time
wishing they were fighting away from the cities so that I could follow what was
happening better. There was a lot of knocking over buildings, glass shattering,
and missiles exploding, but I had a hard time connecting with what the Jaeger
pilots were actually doing. The mind meld aspect I remember being key to the
first movie. It's treated more like a nuisance in Uprising.
The enjoyment of this movie is inversely
proportional to mow much you care to pick at it. The robot vs. monster action
is fun, but it's not greatly staged. The characters are enjoyable without being
indelible. The story is functional without being fully considered. It wasn't as
much pure fun as the first movie, but there's still enough to like to feel like
I got my money's worth.
Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend
No comments:
Post a Comment