Friday, February 28, 2020

Delayed Reaction: In Her Shoes

Premise: Two sisters - one achingly uptight (Toni Collette), one disastrously free-spirited (Cameron Diaz) - go their separate ways after a fight and figure parts of their lives out.

It's pretty much impossible to sell someone on this movie for the right reasons. I know, because I was one of those hard sells. I remember when this movie came out, I dismissed it as some broad female-focused comedy. Basically, it looked like The Sweetest Thing. I have nothing against The Sweetest Thing, but it's a pretty disposable movie. Most movies are.

I hadn't thought about In Her Shoes again until I started listening to the This Had Oscar Buzz podcast. They talk about In Her Shoes a lot. I just figured it was a weird movie that the hosts bonded over. Kind of like how a buddy of mine and I loved Rat Race and talked about it way more than it deserved. They kept insisting that it was actually a really good movie though. By the time they finally did an episode focusing on it, I decided to give it a try to see if I could rely on their taste.

And, yeah. This movie is both really good and really hard to pitch. The first 30 minutes or so are rough and cliched. It makes the movie look really contrived, like dozens of movies I've seen before. Then it takes a turn. When the sisters separate, both their stories get more interesting. Diaz reforms and Collette opens up. Shirley MacLaine shows up and gives the movie a whole new dimension. Pretty quickly, this became my favorite Cameron Diaz role. It's also the most I've liked MacLaine since, uh, Terms of Endearment (I haven't seen a lot of Shirley MacLaine's movies). This movie has a tremendous amount of heart. I fell in love with all the main characters a couple times each.

As I've already said a couple times, I really can't capture what's great about this movie. All I can say is that if you are one of the people like me who dismissed it when it first came out, you should check it out. Many of you will be delightfully surprised.

Verdict: Strongly Recommend

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Movie Reaction: The Assistant


Formula: (1 / Roma) ^ (1 / Hail, Caesar!)

It's hard to get more "inside baseball" than The Assistant. It's a movie about the assistant to a movie executive (more than a little based on Harvey Weinstein). It covers a single day in the life of Jane (Julia Garner). She's the first person in the office, very early in the morning, and one of the last people out. Her job is everything from answering the phones to cleaning up to setting up schedules, making copies, babysitting in a pinch, doing the dishes, ordering lunch, and handling deliveries. I'll go ahead and say one of my small gripes about the movie is how much it packs into a single day. Then again, that possibly reflects that actual amount that a studio assistant does. Throughout the day, Jane gets repeated examples that something isn't proper with her boss. She finds women's jewelry on the ground. Other execs make jokes about sitting on the couch. A young woman shows who is being hired as an "assistant"...just as soon as she signs a lot of legal documents first.

If I had to assign this to a genre, I'd call it a "how you boil a frog" movie. The challenge of the movie seems to be explaining how good - or at least decent - people could let the "casting couch" activities (and worse) go on for so long. They either make jokes about it or convince themselves that it's mutually beneficial to both parties. There's an especially disheartening scene when Jane goes to HR and realizes the degree of difficulty substantiating a complaint; not to mention the horror of realizing that HR isn't as confidential as she believed.

Beyond that though, this movie captures the small indignities in the life of an assistant in this situation well. I'd be shocked if this wasn't written by someone who spent some time in this role. It's too specific to just be passively observed. Julia Garner is tremendous in a very quiet performance. She doesn't say much throughout, and when she does, she uses as few words as possible. She does a great job making a bunch of mundane tasks captivating to watch.

There are a few other familiar faces throughout. Matthew Macfadyen plays the pitch perfect HR manager. Kristine Froseth from Looking For Alaska is well-cast as the new "assistant". Jon Orsini and Noah Robbins are quite good as a couple coworkers who are far more used to the rythms of the office. Robbins in particular offers a glimpse into the nascent form of the type of exec Jane's boss becomes. An interesting choice is that they never actually show her boss. You occasionally hear him, but that's it.

Another detail that struck me was how it handled phone calls. It doesn't sound adjust to make sure you can hear the other end of the call. If anyone in the theater is making any noise, you can't hear what the other person is saying at all. This is intentional, but in a situation where the person next to you is eating popcorn a little loudly, it could be very irritating. This might need to be a subtitle movie for home viewing.

I find it odd that this movie premiered at Telluride, because it has a very Sundance feel to it, given the small budget, level of stars in the cast, and small scope of the story. I often refer to Sundance movies having more of a short story feel. The Assistant doesn't fill 90 minutes and still has a lot of down time. I'm always happy to watch a short movie, but this feels more padded than edited down. The very specific topic and somewhat dry presentation makes this a hard movie to sell to general audiences, but I really liked it for what it was. Julia Garner alone is worth seeing it for. She's inching closer and closer to a major breakout*. It also does a great job setting the scenario that has allowed the Harvey Weinsteins of the world to get away with things for so long.

*Some would argue that her Emmy nominated work on Ozark was already her breakout, but I'm talking about a next-level breakout: Oscar, franchise, and/or leading role.

Verdict: Weakly Recommend

Monday, February 24, 2020

Movie Reaction: The Lodge


Formula: The Shining / Hereditary

As I mentioned after seeing Gretel & Hansel, I love the trend in horror lately. I'm a big fan of the creepy atmospheres, soggy lighting, and lack of jump scares. I just need a couple people put in a scary situation as I watch the dread rise. The Witch, Hereditary, and Midsommar (less soggy, more unnervingly filled with color) are all great. And now it's time for the imitators.

I admit, it's unfair to call The Lodge an imitator. I suspect its development happened separate from what A24's up to. I wouldn't be surprised if the screenplay preceded those other film's releases. It sure fits the trend though. It's got the tragic opening of Midsommar, the dollhouse of Hereditary, and a thematically similar ending to The Witch. It has all the pieces of a movie that was reverse-engineered to fit a trend, even if it's all coincidence. And that's fine with me.

The Lodge is about a young woman, Grace (Riley Keough), and her future step-children (Jaeden Martell, Lia McHugh) stuck in an isolated cabin during a snowstorm. The children's father left their mother for Keough and they aren't pleased with this thanks to some especially severe fallout from the breakup. The father has to leave for business for a couple days and hopes a few days alone with Grace with help her bond with the kids. Pretty soon after he leaves though, the electricity goes out in the cabin and everyone's stuff goes missing, including Grace's dog. Oh, and I forgot to mention. Grace grew up in a cult and was the only survivor of a mass suicide when she was 12. Needless to say, she's got issues, and this event isn't helping things. The scares in the movie are in everyone's response to this situation and the mystery around what happened.

I still don't have an opinion of Riley Keough, despite the fact that she's been in a number of movies I've liked. She's even showed good range. The Lodge has her working where she's most comfortable though. She's good at underplaying, and sort of has that Kristen Stewart thing where she always seems a little tired. It works for the dreary, cold atmosphere of the movie. I'm ever closer to having a real opinion about Keough as a performer (I'm definitely pro-Keough). This was certainly a mark in her favor. Alicia Silverstone plays the mother of the children. It's a small role, but it's the best thing I've seen with her in years. The kids and father were fine.

The movie builds the tension well. Everything about it looks and feels cold. It probably helped that my theater was uncommonly cold to begin with. It doesn't overrely on religious imagery for scares. The movie clocks in at only a little over 1h30m, which is my ideal horror movie length. Ultimately, it lost me toward the end when it started to provide answers that were very underwhelming. That didn't erase the effectiveness of the first 2/3s of it though, which means this was a success in my book.

Verdict: Weakly Recommend




After the Credits
I don't understand a lot of the character decisions in this movie. So, the kids hide all the stuff, then try to trigger Grace to have a mental breakdown. I get that, but what was the plan exactly and why did they stick to it for so long? I feel like as soon as they awake to her in a trance, standing over the son with a gun, they'd be ready to drop the charade. Or how about when Grace decided to travel into the snow on her own? Were they just cool with the idea that she'd go off and freeze to death? It sure was convenient for the plot that she happens to get turned around and ends up back at the house. To use my standard parlance, this majorly fails my "One Big Leap" test. I'm pretty sure the inciting coincidence should be the father inexplicably leaving them alone in a harsh and isolated environment or the fact that Grace was the lone survivor from a mass cult suicide.

The movie never judges the children for how truly awful they are to Grace either. Early on, I believed Grace was going crazy on her own. It transitioned from that to fearing for the children without ever taking a beat to indict the children's actions. That undercut a lot of the investment I'd made into any character.