Thursday, April 5, 2018

April Movie Preview

The was a surprisingly strong March. Let's hope April will be too. Outside of one May release getting pushed up a week, the major studios aren't going hard at winning this month. Mostly, it looks like a month of misfit films that didn't belong on the calendar anywhere else. Action movies that aren't big enough to make noise in the summer. Prestige movies with little hope of getting Oscar attention. Comedies that don't look like hits.

2018
Jan | Feb | Mar  
2017
 Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec   
2016
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec  
2015
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | Jul | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec 
2014
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2013
Mar |  Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec


4/6
Three parents try to stop their daughters from losing their virginity on prom night.
Working For It: Leslie Mann, John Cena, and Ike Barinholtz have all been comedy weapons in other movies and have proven that they are game for just about anything. This could be a good showcase for all three of them. There aren't many movies of this ilk told from the parents' perspective, so that could be a nice change of pace.
Working Against It: I can't deal with the movie's name and all the winking and nudging about it in the advertising. I get it. [Cock] Blockers. The three leads are all known for stealing scenes, not necessarily leading movies. I worry the least about Mann, because she impressed me so much in The Other Woman and her husband (Judd Apatow) has given her plenty of juicy roles over the years*. Cena tries really damn hard, and that eventually pays off. However, I'm not convinced that enthusiasm has developed into comedic timing yet. Barinholtz will be the most telling. He can always get a laugh from me, but I do worry that too much of him could get exhausting. I'm a little worried as well about who is behind the camera. This is Kay Cannon's (a terrific comedy writer) directing debut and she didn't write the script. I'd think she'd be more prepared to direct a script if which she wrote it. However, for all I know, she may have completely rewritten it but credit went elsewhere due to WGA rules. Still, I'm concerned.
My Stance: I'm going to see it for the talent on screen but I'm not that optimistic.
*That's not to say she owes her career to him or anything. He's just ensured that she's gotten as many opportunities as her talent deserves.

A speculative take on the Teddy Roosevelt scandal that derailed his hopes of ever becoming president.
Working For It: I mentioned this one a few months back. I rightly assumed that its release would get pushed back since there was almost no information I could find about it at the time. I've got a little more information about it now. The Chappaquiddick scandal is a great topic for a director with a clear vision for how to handle it. There are enough holes in the story to interpret it however you want.
Working Against It: What's the nice way to say this is a second-tier cast? I like Jason Clarke a lot, but he isn't good enough to look past some unnatural makeup they put on him. I've liked Kata Mara and Olivia Thirlby in plenty of movies and shows, but they've never been the draw of those movies and shows. Jim Gaffigan and Ed Helms could be serious actors if they want. Just look at Steve Carrell. This isn't the right venue to break into that though. Try Sundance a little more first. The trailer just made Bruce Dern look silly. There's no one behind the camera that excites me either.
My Stance: As much as I like stories based on historical events, this looks very skippable.

A volleyball teams tries to save their season after the death of one of their teammates
Working For It: It's nice to see someone other than Disney getting in on the inspirational sports movie game. It even has a few "I like them. Why don't they work more?" actors like Oscar winners Helen Hunt and William Hurt. I'm sure someone in the young cast will break big and increase this film's profile in about 10 years. Erin Moriarty or Danika Yarosh, maybe?
Working Against It: I don't care much for volleyball. When the stakes are as obvious as in this film, I'm going to need a little more to draw me in. Maybe a really interesting performance or a quippy script. Like, imagine what The Winning Season would've been like without Sam Rockwell.
My Stance: I'm ready to forget about this movie as soon as I finish this sentence.

A family must stay completely silent to avoid detection by creates that have overrun the Earth.
Working For It: It stars real-life delightful married couple John Krasinski and Emily Blunt. The pitch is immediately compelling. That's all I really need for a 90 minute horror thriller.
Working Against It: Krasinski hasn't directed anything at all like this before. The major studio PG-13 horror movies almost always find a way to pull back at the end and stop the film from really being scary. This looks an awful lot like I Am Legend in that way.
My Stance: It's really going to come down to how much of an Emily Blunt mood I'm in at the time.

The Endless [Limited]
Two men return to visit to the cult they used to belong to and are given possibly supernatural reasons to reconsider it.
Working For It: This is right up my alley. A mystery with some horror elements. Elements of found footage. A bunch of unknown actors who I'll probably recognize a lot of in about 5 years.
Working Against It: This feels like a lot is going to be riding on how it ends. That makes me nervous.
My Stance: While I doubt I'll find it in theaters, I can almost garuntee I'll watch it when it gets to a streaming site.

Lean on Pete [Limited]
I've covered this before. The fact that the release date keeps changing doesn't worry me that much. I don't think there's any natural release date for a movie about a boy and his horse.

A veteran who tracks down missing girls for a living gets tied up in a dangerous conspiracy on one of his jobs.
Working For It: Joaquin Phoenix got a lot of praise for this at Cannes last year and this is exactly the kind of role I'd expect him to be great with. No one does the "raw nerve" thing better.
Working Against It: This looks unrelentingly brutal. I only have so much tolerance for that.
My Stance: The odds that I'll need to take a break in the middle of watching this will keep me out of the theater, I suspect.

4/13
A dramatization of the 1980 Wimbeldon showdown between Bjorn Borg and Jon McEnroe.
Working For It: Shia LaBeouf is both a perfect and a poor choice to play McEnroe. He can pull off the anger and explosiveness. He just doesn't look that much like him. Or maybe I just know what McEnroe looks like too much. It'll be a fun performance. I don't know much about Sverrir Gundnason, but he looks intense as Borg.
Working Against It: I don't know the director or writer's work. The cast isn't all that impressive.
My Stance: I'm all Tennis-ed out after The Battle of the Sexes.

A scientific experiment makes The Rock's ape friend continue to grow until he's city-smashing big.
Working For It: Never underestimate Dwayne Johnson's ability to make a movie watchable. I like Malin Akerman and Naomie Harris too. Oh, and Jeffrey Dean Morgan. It's from Johnson's San Andreas director, so you no what to expect.
Working Against It: I've been in no hurry to see San Andreas. In general, I'm not sure why I should care about a knock-off King Kong. It's like this movie was written by learning all the wrong lessons from Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
My Stance: I'll probably end up seeing it, but I'm not excited to see it.

An animated movie about a dog who becomes a WWI hero.
Working For It: I've always found WWI to be criminally under represented in film. I suppose this is my "put up or shut up" moment for support.
Working Against It: It's still so hard to make a CGI animated movie, that I simply don't trust a non-major studio to come out with a good one. Eventually I will be wrong about this.
My Stance: Just as soon as I get to The Wild Life.

A young woman is stalked by a deadly truth or dare game.
Working For It: I like Lucy Hale whenever she shows up in anything. I'm certain to like her in this.
Working Against It: I couldn't name another person in the cast, and haven't I made it clear by now what my opinion of major studio PG-13 horror movies is? Until proven wrong, I'll assume this isn't very good.
My Stance: It might be a slow enough weekend for Lucy Hale to be enough to convince me.

Isle of Dogs [Expanding]
I'm pretty sure I covered this last month. Even if I hadn't, I'd done talking about it. I've seen this trailer an unconscionable number of times before seeing other movies. I'm done.

A Korean found-footage horror movie about people exploring a haunted abandoned asylum.
Working For It: I love found-footage horror. This is a simple premise that's hard to mess up.
Working Against It: Subtitles in found-footage movies take me out of it
My Stance: Once I find out about a horror movie that sounds at all interesting, it's basically a lock that I'll see it eventually.

Beirut [Limited]
A US Diplomat is called upon to negotiate after a friend is taken hostage.
Working For It: Jon Hamm hasn't been able to make much of a movie career yet, but anyone as good as he was on a show as good as Mad Men shouldn't be counted out. Rosamund Pike also hasn't been able to use Gone Girl as the launching pad I'd hoped it could be.The director of The Machinist directed a script from the Rogue One scribe. I can get behind that.
Working Against It: What's with all the 70s/80s Middle East movies lately? Did the rest of Hollywood just find out about Argo last year?
My Stance: Eh. I'm good.

4/20
After getting hit in the head, a woman wakes up believing she the most beautiful woman in the world.
Working For It: The duo the wrote and directed perfectly fine comedies like Never Been Kissed and How to Be Single wrote and directed this Amy Schumer comedy. I'll be honest, I'm considering seeing this just for the possibility of seeing Michelle Williams and Busy Phillips (real life best friends) on screen together. It's got SNL types like Sasheer Zamata and Aidy Bryant too.
Working Against It: This sure feels like an Inside Amy Schumer sketch that's been stretched into a 90 minute movie.
My Stance: I just need any evidence there's more to this than the pitch.

The troopers are called on to establish a highway patrol in a Canadian town that just found out it's actually American.
Working For It: Super Troopers is a massive cult hit. The people who love it really love it. There's nothing about this humor that makes me think it would lose anything as a sequel.
Working Against It: I didn't like Super Troopers at all. It's not my kind of humor.
My Stance: I'm not sure what it would take to get me to watch this.

A couple on a country getaway are terrorized by a biker gang.
Working For It: Omar Epps, Paula Patton, Missi Pyle, Dawn Olivieri, William Fichtner, and Roselyn Sanchez is a group of actors I have nothing against.
Working Against It: Any time a movie cast sounds like the cast of a CBS pilot, that's a bad sign.
My Stance: Nope

The director of The Exorcist makes a documentary about a priest performing an exorcism.
Working For It: William Feiedkin is leaning into his legacy pretty hard and I'm OK with it. Can you think of anyone better to make a film about exorcism?
Working Against It: I do worry that they are going to play up the scares more than they need to. I'm actually more interested in a non-sensational look at exorcism.
My Stance: It's certainly on my radar now.

Godard Mon Amour [Limited]
A comedic account of Anne Wiazemsky's marriage to legendary French filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard.
Working For It: It's a French film from the director of The Artist and he brought his wife, the lovely Benenice Bejo, along with him again. I wouldn't mind seeing a dramatization of Godard's life.
Working Against It: I think I'd need to learn a lot more about Godard to be able to appreciate the humor in this, especially since I'll be dealing with a language barrier.
My Stance: I'll probably forget about this movie, if I'm being honest.

4/27
Everyone in the Marvel universe must join forces to defeat a powerful being known as Thanos.
Working For It: Say what you will about the Marvel universe, but they've collected an impressive group of actors. Karen Gillan, Elizabeth Olsen, Josh Brolin, Scarlett Johansson, Zoe Saldana, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Robert Downey Jr, Linda Cardellini, Chadwick Boseman, Letitia Wright, Tom Holland, Tom Hiddleston, Chris Pratt, Idris Elba, Benedict Cumberbatch, Jeremy Renner, Benicio Del Toro, Bradley Cooper, Paul Rudd, Paul Bettany, Jon Favreau, Peter Dinklage, Mark Ruffalo. Put any four of those people in a movie together and that would be a movie I'm a lock to see. And that's not even the full list. The Russo brothers are coming over from the Captain America movies to direct this. Screenplay from the scribes of the Captain America movies as well. I'm not expecting this to be a masterpiece, but it'll be fun.
Working Against It: This is the poster child of too many cooks in the kitchen and too many ingredients in the soup. It's hard to get more overstuffed than this. I struggle to see how it won't be a mess, or at the very least, not worth all the build up.
My Stance: I'm looking forward to other movies this year more, but it's hard to think of many that I'm more guaranteed to see.

Disobedience [Limited]
After the death of her father, a woman returns to the ultra-conservative Jewish community that shunned her years ago.
Working For It: I forgot to mention that it's a forbidden romance movie, between Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams. What more do you need to know? It's from the director of this year's Foreign Film Oscar winner.
Working Against It: Homosexual love in a strict religious community is a cliche by now, right?
My Stance: You had me at Rachel.

Kings [Limited]
A woman tries to hold her family together during the LA riots of 1992.
Working For It: Halle Berry is the matriarch. Daniel Craig is the crotchety neighbor. I'm sure there will be some good melodrama.
Working Against It: I'm a little suspicious about a Turkish director's take on the LA riots. There's a lot of things foreign directors are great at, but understanding US race relations isn't always one of them.
My Stance: There are too many documentaries about the riots I need to get to first.


Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Movie Reaction: The Death of Stalin

Formula: Russia ^ In the Loop

It's important to know what you do well. Armando Ianucci is among the best comedy writers in any country. He has a very specific skill set though. His series The Thick of It was a satire of the inner workings of the British government and the awful people who work in it. His movie In the Loop was a satire of Anglo-American politics and the awful people who work on both sides. His series Veep is a satire about the US Presidency and the awful people who work in for it. It should surprise no one that his latest film, The Death of Stalin, is a satire about the 1950s Russian government and the awful people in charge of it. Ianucci can get by with being so one-note because he's awful damn good at what he does.

The Death of Stalin has all of Ianucci's trademarks. The humor is dark. The swearing is inventive. I don't think anyone blocks a comedy scene better than him. When I say that The Death of Stalin is Veep in 1950s Russia, that isn't an oversimplification. It's high praise.

Certainly, the better versed in Russian history you are, the better you'll get all the jokes in the movie. It's not required to follow the what's going on though. I only have basic knowledge of that period. I recognize some names, know that Stalin had a lot of people killed, and that's about it. And I still followed the movie fine. That's because it's not hard to understand a power struggle. The film begins with Stalin (Adrian McLoughlin) alive long enough to set the tone of how completely and ruthlessly he ruled. Then, he has a cerebral hemorrhage. Before he's even officially dead, the ministers in his cabinet all start maneuvering to become his successor. Immediate control technically goes to Deputy General Secretary Gregory Malenkov (Jeffrey Tambor). He's incompetent though, and it quickly turns into a fight between Lavrentiy Beria (Simon Russell Beale) and Nikita Khrushchev (Steve Buscemi), who use every savvy and petty trick they can to get the upper hand. Circling around them are the likes of Stalin's adult children, Vasily (Rupert Friend) - a drunken fool - and Svetlana (Andrea Riseborough), the cocky head of the Russian Army, Georgy Zhukov (Jason Isaacs), and the other more guileless secretaries in Stalin's cabinet. It's actually pretty easy to follow everything because the details matter less than the pettiness.

I don't believe any of the major actors have worked with Ianucci before, which is shocking, considering how naturally all of them fit in this world. Tambor is a delightful goof. There's more than a few shades of Hank Kingsley in that character. Few people are able to be annoyed better than Steve Buscemi, who looks irritated by every single person he believes he's smarter than. Simon Russell Beale plays Beria as rat who knows the rules of the game as well as anyone and gets cocky about it. Friend's Vasily is a drunken mess. Jason Isaacs makes Zhukov into the most self-confident son of a bitch you'll ever meet. Andrea Riseborough's Svetlana clearly isn't built for this duplicitous world and is caught in the middle of it only because he father happens to be Joseph Stalin. Really impeccable casting.

One notable difference from other Ianucci projects is that The Death of Stalin is willing to pause occasionally to reflect on the horror of what these people are doing. Because, Stalin's Russia was pretty evil at times. He executed a lot of people. Ianucci doesn't hide that. He plays it in that darkly comedic way in which a scene is funny until it's really not, and you feel bad for laughing before. The movie is still 95% pure comedy, but be warned that there are a few sobering moments.

This is a hard film to rate. It's a very funny comedy with exactly the kind of humor that I like. I don't know if it'll work for everyone. Luckily, there are plenty of movies and shows you can use as a test to see if you'll enjoy this. If you don't like Veep, I don't imagine this will be any different. There isn't much that's cinematic about the movie. It's feels much like a long TV show. As I mentioned at the beginning. It plays to its strengths and ignores everything else. That's fine with me.

Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Delayed Reaction: Pumping Iron

The Pitch: Bodybuilders aren't freaks. See?

A documentary about top bodybuilders preparing for the 1975 Mister Olympia competition.


I was going to start this post by saying that there's no one quite like Arnold Schwazenegger. That's incorrect though. There's an almost exact modern contemporary: Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. Both men started off as physical performers in niche or under-respected pseudo-sports. They broke into movies because of their physical presence. Both rose in popularity because of a willingness to do anything and their undeniable charisma. They employed the same crazy work ethic that made them a success in their last jobs to rise in the movie ranks above more naturally talented performers. Hell, Arnold became governor or California and now people are joking (or maybe they aren't joking) that The Rock should run for President.

The most interesting similarity that I've found is that they both initially shot up in personality for being villains. I watched WWF WWE back in the day and when Rocky Maivia became The Rock, he was a heel. His character was a pompous jerk. Fans didn't love to hate him. They just loved him. Often in professional wrestling, the writers manipulate the audience to like or hate a performer. Occasionally, as it was with The Rock, it works the other way around and the organizers have to rewrite on the fly. Similarly, Arnold is the villain in Pumping Iron. In my notes, I compared him and Lou Farigno to Mozart and Salieri if Mozart actually did put in the work to be better than Salieri. Arnold is smug. He's cocky. My god is he cocky. That breakfast with Lou Farigno the morning of Mr. Olympia is a masterclass is cockiness. His interviews, like when he compares working out to cumming, is the insufferable ranting of the least likeable character in any movie. However, somehow I don't come away hating him. I don't know if it's his pure charisma. Maybe it's the fact that he's the best because I can believe that he also works the hardest. Whatever it is, after watching this, it's easy to see how in a decade, Arnold would become one of the biggest stars in the world despite all his limitations as a performer.

The rest of the documentary is nothing special. Some voice-overs fill the audience in on some things. Cut to some interviews and profiles on different competitors. It's all building to a competition. It's transparently edited to tell a story that's more heightened. Very standard stuff. I did enjoy learning about the bodybuilding. Without Arnold, I can't imagine this being worth watching. It would be like King of  Kong without Billy Mitchell. And, who wants to watch that?

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend*

*I thought about bumping it up to Strongly because there's nothing weak about these guys

Monday, April 2, 2018

Movie Reaction: Ready Player One


Formula: Tron / (The LEGO Movie * Wreck-It Ralph)

I almost never read books before movies. There's a lot of reason for this. Many aren't flattering. I've never been a disciplined enough person for the engagement required for a book. I'm a slow reader. That certainly doesn't help. I'm ashamed of how little I do read, and it's a constant self-improvement goal of mine. There is some reason for it though. I'm not a man of varied interests. I'm more for obsessions. My obsessions are TV and movies. And even those battle for my time in a way that I consider dropping one to better focus on the other. I listen to music some, but I gave up on ever being knowledgeable about that. To an extent, I've accepted that I'll never be someone with a large library of books either. I'd honestly rather be well watched than well read. I get more out of how all the elements of a movie or show come together. I can understand how one person can write a great book. However, the idea of dozens or hundreds of people somehow making a great movie or show is magic to me. And I hate depriving myself of the thrill of that. The few times I've read a book before seeing a movie, I've come out of the movie disappointed. The discussion becomes more about the adaptation than the filmmaking. I know some people love that and more power to them. I actually prefer the opposite, reading afterwards. I've always liked research more than interpretation.

This is all a long-winded way of saying that I haven't read Ready Player One. And I'm really happy that I didn't.

Ready Player One is based on the novel by Ernest Cline, who assisted with the screenplay as well. It takes place in the year 2046. The world is falling apart as people retreat to an all-purpose virtual world called the Oasis. There, people create avatars, make and lose money, and live lives they can't in the real world. A few years before the book begins, the creator of the Oasis, James Halliday (Mark Rylance), before he dies, leaves his incredible fortune, including control of the Oasis, hidden deep inside the Oasis as an Easter egg. Halliday buried this Easter egg so deep that only the most skilled and determined players are still actively searching for it. By the time the film begins, there are mainly two camps on the hunt: Lone wolf Gunters (Egg hunters), like our protagonist Wade Watts (Tye Sheridan), known as Parzival in the Oasis, who want to win for personal riches/glory or to keep the freedom of the Oasis in tact, and employees at IOI, your typical evil super corporation, who want control of the Oasis so they can milk it for maximum profit. IOI doesn't play nice though. In addition to using their almost unlimited resources toward beating the challenges that Halliday has left to find the Easter egg, IOI also goes after people in the real world in severe and fatal ways. After Wade becomes the first person to ever complete Halliday's first of three challenges, he gets put on IOI's radar, and finds himself at the center of the battle for the Oasis.

This isn't a simple premise. I only covered the basics in that last paragraph. I imagine the most difficult part of this adaptation was finding a way to explain this world without turning it into a series of exposition dumps. Mostly, Stephen Spielberg and company do this very successfully. A lot of effort is put into visualizing everything as it's explained. The film doesn't get bogged down in the details more than it has too. It tells us just enough to get going and fills in the blanks as needed. This is Spielberg at his most playful. Like Jurassic Park, Minority Report, or Raiders of the Lost Ark he introduces this new world without it feeling like homework and takes advantage of all the fun that can be had there.

This is a pop culture obsessed movie. 80s pop culture in particular. Spielberg is an interesting choice for the movie. After all, 80s pop culture owes more to Spielberg than anyone else. At the same time, this isn't really his pop culture. I'm sure he knows of all the things being referenced in the movie, but I don't think these are the things in his DNA the way they would be for someone born in the 70s. It's the different between knowing something is important on your own and knowing because someone told you. It doesn't make a huge difference, but it can be felt in places. For example, I suspect that Spielberg is an Iron Giant fan more than a Gundam fan. There's also the fact that they had to work around some intellectual property rights. We've been spoiled by the anarchy of The LEGO Movie and its ability to pull from almost anything. I don't know what the novel does and doesn't reference, but it's strange to watch something this much about nerd pop culture of the 80s without any Star Wars (owned by Disney). Little omissions like that can be felt if you are looking. Overall though, there's still a dizzying number of references from Atari to A ha to The Shining and beyond. Kline has built a canny explanation for the specific pop culture references in the story. The reason why everyone is obsessed with 60 year old pop culture is because the Oasis is built in Halliday's image both intentionally and accident. Obviously, Halliday's initial design ideas come from that period, so they are built into the foundation of the Oasis. His death perpetuates it though. To be able to find Halliday's Easter egg, people have to understand him better. As a result, most people have basic if not scholarly knowledge of his era and interests.

I was impressed by the way they cast the movie. They cast for fit, not star wattage. Tye Sheridan has an impressive filmography for a 21 year old, but I'm not sure he'll be leading a lot of action movies. His greatest strength in this is that he's able to be pretty anonymous. Olivia Cooke plays Art3mis, one of Wade's main allies. Between Me & Earl & The Dying Girl, Bates Motel, and Thoroughbreds, I'm all in with Olivia Cooke. She's great at using sarcasm without sacrificing sincerity. She's introduced problematically at first, somewhat by design, but gets a fleshed out character by the end. At first, I thought Mark Rylance was a weird choice for Halliday. Rylance is so steely and determined in Dunkirk. Spielberg uses him differently though. In Bridge of Spies he plays his character aloof, like he's only half-paying attention at any moment. In TheBFG, he's very gentle. That fits Halliday, who Rylance plays as a thoughtful and spaced-out creator. It made me laugh at first, but by the end, it was very sweet. Ben Mendelsohn plays the evil CEO of IOI. It's a natural role for him, easily a cousin of his character in Rogue One. Sometimes, obvious casting is the right casting. He's a businessman who got into IT without knowing about computers and doesn't respect the culture of the business he works in. A couple other familiar faces (if not familiar names) show up too, like Simon Pegg and Lena Waithe, and they happily lean into their characters.

Look, I had a blast watching this movie. Spielberg's execution of this world is genuinely impressive. Going into the movie, I was worried about the idea of the Oasis, because it's so vast and chaotic. It needed a master like Speilberg who wouldn't be intimidated by the size of the playground. He is fully engaged and has a lot fun with it. The story in the screenplay is admittedly a little lacking. Or rather, there's too much. The film tries to stick to the bare bones of the story (the quest to find the Halliday's Easter egg) as much as it can. It's less successful when it expands beyond that. There's a love story between Parzival and Art3mis  that I didn't buy at all. At one point, we meet all of Wade's Oasis friends in person, and I realized that half of them meant nothing to me. There just wasn't enough time to get to know every character beyond the broad strokes. The same goes with parts of Halliday's backstory. There's just too much for the movie to handle. I'm not sure that there would've been enough to justify breaking it into two movies, but you could definitely feel the struggle to fit it all into one.

Much like the movie, I'm having trouble fitting all my thoughts into this post. I had such a good time watching this. The world is well realized. More importantly, it is nostalgia done right. A lot of shows and movies these days play on nostalgia lazily. It's a matter of using a known brand to get you to buy into something not as good. Ready Player One is more about the affection itself. It's pop culture crazy because of a love of pop culture, not because it gets a bigger audience. Even if you don't care about pop culture, it's a well-paced adventure movie with relatable protagonists and easily detestable villains, made by a director who's made a career out of making familiar structures feel like magic.

Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend

Sunday, April 1, 2018

Delayed Reaction: The Public Enemy

The Pitch: The most violent American movie of 1931.

The rise and fall of a gangster during Prohibition.

The main reason I saw this is because I'd still like to get through all the movies referenced in The Great Movie Ride even if it's no longer around at Disney World.
The remarkable thing about this movie is how much of the spine of every gangster movie is in this. The humble beginnings. The rise. The fall. The family and romantic conflicts. I've seen it all before in movies released much later. Now, I'm not sure if Public Enemy set the template (something tells me it didn't), but it's still cool to see how fully formed the narrative was in 1931.

Apparently, the "Grapefruit scene" is a big deal. They even mention it of the Neflix sleeve the DVD came in. I think I must be missing some context. Is it so well remembered for being shocking? I've seen much more shocking things over the years. Is it that it's silly? I've seen much bigger gaffes as well. Is it the fact that's it's a man abusing a woman? Sadly, I've seen much worst examples of that too. Whatever the reason, I know that it's remembered because it's such an old movie, so the "for the time" qualifier is supposed to be added to it. I'm not even sure what to add the qualifier to though. Shocking for the time. Bizarre for the time. Violent for the time. I will say this: It is the most memorable scene in the movie. Then again, I wasn't that enamored by the movie.

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend