Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Movie Reaction: Wildlife

Formula: Boyhood / Hope Floats

Intentional or not, Wildlife, Paul Dano's directorial debut, co-written by him and long-time girlfriend, Zoe Kazan (neither are in the movie), is the answer to the age old question "what does a RomCom look like 15 years later?" Two pretty people. Both are dreamers who think in big gestures rather than consistent small, loving actions. People who think their lives are the center of the story. 15 years later, what does that relationship look like?

Dano and Kazan move the answer to the 1960s, and it's not an encouraging answer. Carey Mulligan plays Jeanette, a 34 year old mother of a 14 year old boy, Joe (Ed Oxenbould). She's a housewife who works hard to fit the role and always stay positive. She's married to Jerry (Jake Gyllenhaal), a friendly guy who tries to use his charm to make up for his questionable work ethic and inability to follow the rules. He's a stubborn man whose pride gets in his way. This has caused the family to move several times over the years as he hunts for employment. The movie begins at a turning point. Joe has just moved the family to a small Montana town and gets fired from the golf pro job that brought him there. Despite other offers, Jerry decides that his only option is to take a job fighting the wildfires far, far outside of town. It's a dangerous job, especially for someone inexperienced like himself, and it means that he has to disappear for weeks. He makes this decision abruptly and unilaterally.
This breaks Jeanette. Instead of being distraught by his absence or pretending like everything is normal, as soon as Joe leaves, she snaps into her default mode: she starts living her life like she's in a RomCom. Except, she's in the Hope Floats/How Stella Got Her Groove Back RomCom. She starts taking control of her life, not living it for someone else. She acts impetuously and stops playing nice.

Only, there's one problem: she's still the mother of a 14 year old. In fact, Wildlife is told from Joe's perspective, not Jeanette's, and that makes it a deeply uncomfortable movie. Because, in Joe's eyes, his father just left him for a dangerous job, and his mother has abandoned any pretense of taking care of him. It's never entirely clear how common this is for him. I suspect that Jeanette has always been a little more frank than the idealized 60s housewife she nearly pulls off early in the movie, but she's never swung this much. Joe's reaction to it doesn't quite match up with her ease with the change.

Ed Oxenbould is a fantastic observer in the movie. He drives very little of the story. This is by design. He's not Jay Gatsby. He's Nick Carraway. (It's funny that I thought of that comparison, given Mulligan's connection to it.) Oxenbould reacts to everything really well. He's able to convey confusion, fear, and anger without saying much. I could see in his eyes how he's processing events as they are happening. Carey Mulligan is the star of the movie, as the parent who is around the whole time. She's so good at the perfect housewife facade early on, that it's jarring when she drops it later. He actions seem frantic only because the movie is following Joe, not her the whole time. Had the movie followed her, I could almost see this movie being a comedy. What's impulsive and zany to one person is scary and unreliable to another. The movie has made me reconsider a lot of older RomComs. How would Tom Hanks' or Julia Roberts' kids feel about what's going on? Of course, this assumes that all those kids wouldn't be written as "precocious" as a cover-all fix. Gyllanhaal is much less present in the movie but good when he's around. Like his wife, he's also finding that the American dream he's been chasing isn't working out. I like how the screenplay teases certain problems with his character that don't play out as I expected.

I like the idea of Wildlife more than the execution. That's to be expected. I've never been a fan of squirm comedy, so it's no surprise that I'm repelled by squirm drama. Most of the movie is about people lying to each other's faces and assuming the other people will be too polite to say anything. I'm certain that if I was able to ask Dano or Kazan about the movie, they'd be able to go into great detail about the deeper meaning of a lot of things in the movie, but I had a tough time finding the point of the movie by myself. I appreciate the new perspective on things, but that perspective left Mulligan's character in particular too opaque to connect with. Mulligan's performance is great within those restraints. I wish I knew more about how much of a change she's gone through. I don't have enough of an idea who she was before, so I can't gauge if I believe where she ends up.

Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

No comments:

Post a Comment