Wednesday, July 18, 2018

Delayed Reaction: A Royal Affair

The Pitch: In five years, you're going to be so damn excited to see who is in this movie.

The queen and the royal physician have an affair and try to sneak the Enlightenment into the Danish kingdom.

I'm not sure I've ever had two Scandinavian actors to be this excited about seeing in a movie. Back in 2012, I didn't really know Alicia Vikander or Mads Mikkelsen. I didn't remember Mikkelsen from Casino Royale, and Hannibal was still a year away from premiering. I recognized Vikander for being very pretty in Anna Karenina, but that's about it. Of course, now I love them both, which made A Royal Affair an inevitability. The only obstacle was finding some time for a subtitled movie.

In a way, the mark of a good historical drama is if I feel the need to pull up the Wikipedia page about the people or events. That indicates that I'm interested by the story and want to verify how much is true. A Royal Affair does appear to be some exaggeration and infers some events. I did pull up that Wikipedia article to learn about the Enlightenment and Denmark in the 1700s, so that's a success. I liked the decision to underplay the king's mental illness. Reading about it later, a lot of his "illness" sounded like exaggerations made by a conservative society. It isn't career-best work for Vikander or Mikkelsen, and their age gap was a bit distracting, but they were good in it. The miscommunications and lies at the end made for a nice gut punch.

Oh, and this isn't the movie's fault but I got really confused about Vikander's backstory at the beginning. So, she is a Swedish woman playing a British woman who moves to Denmark to become their queen. I got so confused about why she was speaking English early on. I'm so aware of Vikander being a Swede, that I couldn't process the idea of her being a Brit adopting Danish. I'm dumb. Please ignore me.

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend

No comments:

Post a Comment