Friday, February 17, 2017

Oscar Predictions: Best Cinematography

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.

Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts
Introduction & Documentary Feature
Foreign Film
Visual Effects
Production Design
Supporting Actor
Supporting Actress

Glossary:
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
ACS - American Cinematographer Society Award

Even though the precursors for cinematography aren't perfect, if you look at the winners, they normally make sense. You don't find many movies that win only cinematography. After the big four (acting, editing, directing, and screenplay) it's the next most likely category to match the best picture winner. Don't expect the voters to overthink this one.
The BAFTA award for Cinematography has called the last 4 winners and hasn't failed to nominate the eventual Oscar winner in at least 20 years. It has only matched 9 of the last 20 winners though.
The American Society of Cinematographers are about as reliable. They've matched 11 of the last 20 winners and nominated the Oscar winner 19 times (only missing Pan's Labyrinth in 2006, which could be a result of it being a foreign film).

La La Land
BAFTA - Cinematography - Nominee
ASC - Cinematography - Winner
I've mentioned the possibility of a La La Land sweep a lot. While I don't expect the movie to break the Oscar record of 11 wins, I expect it will get close. Cinematography is a hard one to argue with. The ASC had all the same nominees as the Oscars and La La Land came away with the win.

Lion
BAFTA - Cinematography - Winner
ASC - Cinematography - Nominee
I feel safe saying that the BAFTAs have more love for Lion than the Oscars will. The BAFTA win still makes it the second most likely winner.

Arrival
BAFTA - Cinematography - Nominee
ASC - Cinematography - Nominee
The last 20 Oscar winners have been nominated for the BAFTA and Arrival is the only other Oscar nominee recognized by them. More often than not, when the BAFTA and ASC don't agree on a winner, neither of their picks win the Oscar. Combine those two facts and Arrival is quite the Dark Horse.

Silence
ASC - Cinematography - Nominee
The cinematography carries this film. Silence was ignored everywhere else by the Academy, which isn't great for its odds. It's one of those films like Pan's Labyrinth or Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon that could end up winning on the overwhelming strength of the cinematography.

Moonlight
ASC - Cinematography - Nominee
While this is a beautiful film, more people are focused on the performances and screenplay.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Oscar Predictions: Best Supporting Actress

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.

Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts
Introduction & Documentary Feature
Foreign Film
Visual Effects
Production Design
Supporting Actor

Glossary:
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
Golden Globe - Presented by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association  Award
SAG - Screen Actors Guild Award

It's really hard to track the supporting actress race. There's a lot of category fraud that goes on. All the time, co-leads are moved to supporting categories where they have a better chance to win. Just last year, Alicia Vikander and Rooney Mara were called supporting actresses in leading roles. Thankfully, this year is much more stable.

Viola Davis (Fences)
Golden Globe - Supporting Actress - Winner
SAG - Supporting Actress - Winner
BAFTA - Supporting Actress - Winner
Well, this is easy. Everything is working in Davis' favor. She has won every precursor award. That's happened 6 times in the last two decades. Every time that's happened, the actress also won an Oscar. She's won against a virtually identical list of actresses each time. She's virtually a lead in Fences. There is a feeling that it's "her time". Also, after two years of #OscarSoWhite, don't think voters wouldn't be delighted to have someone of color getting a trophy. Oh yeah, and she's incredible in the movie. This might be even more of a lock than all the La La Land wins.

Michelle Williams (Manchester by the Sea)
Golden Globe - Supporting Actress - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actress - Nominee
BAFTA - Supporting Actress - Nominee
No one else is winning, but if I have to pick someone second, I might as well go with the frontrunner before Fences came into the picture. Williams isn't in Manchester enough to make this competitive.

Naomie Harris (Moonlight)
Golden Globe - Supporting Actress - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actress - Nominee
BAFTA - Supporting Actress - Nominee
It doesn't matter how I order the rest of these. Harris has been a staple throughout the season and does great work in Moonlight.

Nicole Kidman (Lion)
Golden Globe - Supporting Actress - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actress - Nominee
BAFTA - Supporting Actress - Nominee
Kidman is better than I expected in Lion. She already has her Oscar though. No need to get her another yet.

Octavia Spencer (Hidden Figures)
Golden Globe - Supporting Actress - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actress - Nominee
The same thing I said about Kidman goes for Spencer.

Oscar Predictions: Best Supporting Actor

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.


Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts
Introduction & Documentary Feature
Foreign Film
Visual Effects
Production Design

Glossary:
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
Golden Globe - Presented by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association  Award
SAG - Screen Actors Guild Award

It's the second year in a row without a mandate for Supporting Actor. All three precursor awards went in a different direction, so the history of each precursor should be considered. The Golden Globes were on such a hot streak until last year. From 2007-2014 they matched the Oscar winner, then went with Sylvester Stallone in 2015. You'd think the SAG award would be reliable. The actors are the largest branch of the Motion Picture Academy after all. They've called 13 of the last 20 winners and only failed to nominate the winner in 2012 (Christoph Waltz - Django Unchained). The BAFTAs have matched the Oscar winner 8 of the last 10 years. The only exceptions were 2013, when Dallas Buyers Club oddly was ignored by the British Academy and 2010, when they couldn't help themselves from choosing a winner from the English-centric The King's Speech (Geoffrey Rush). In the decade before that run though, they only matched the Oscar winner once.

Mahershala Ali (Moonlight)
Golden Globes - Supporting Actor - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actor - Winner
BAFTA - Supporting Actor - Nominee
He's just gotta win, right? I'm still pretty stunned that he lost the Golden Globe. I figured the BAFTA was less likely. The SAG win is key, especially since it was against 4 of the 5 Oscar nominees. The Moonlight ensemble is so strong, someone has to win.

Jeff Bridges (Hell or High Water)
Golden Globes - Supporting Actor - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actor - Nominee
BAFTA - Supporting Actor - Nominee
Perhaps I'm being foolish for thinking he stands a chance. This would be the first time since 1998 that someone won this award without winning any of the precursors. He got his Oscar finally in 2009, so there's no "it's his time" push going on. It's the kind of unassuming role that could sneak up on people.

Dev Patel (Lion)
Golden Globes - Supporting Actor - Nominee
SAG - Supporting Actor - Nominee
BAFTA - Supporting Actor - Winner
The BAFTA win helps a lot and he's arguably the lead for Lion. He's one of the three Oscar nominees that was recognized by all three of the precursor groups. His BAFTA win reminds me of the Geoffrey Rush win for The King's Speech in 2010: the Brits rewarding one of their own.

Lucas Hedges (Manchester by the Sea)
SAG - Supporting Actor - Nominee
The SAG nomination is nice. He's the third most likely cast member from Manchester to win an Oscar. Given that Casey Affleck's chances are fading and Michelle Williams is all but out of contention for hers, that puts Hedges' odds quickly approaching 0.

Michael Shannon (Nocturnal Animals)
His cast-mate Aaron Taylor-Johnson got all the love from the Globes and BAFTAs. That Shannon got nominated at all beat some tough odds.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Oscar Predictions: Best Production Design

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.

Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts
Introduction & Documentary Feature
Foreign Film
Visual Effects

Glossary:
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
ADG - Art Director's Guild Award

Production Design is one of the lazier awards. It's one of those that will come along for the ride when one movie sweeps the technical categories. I compared correlated categories and noticed that Production Design and Costume Design agree the second most of any set of categories. What that means is that voters pick whatever they think looks busy or pretty.
The BAFTA award is an OK precursor. It has nominated the Oscar winner 19 of the last 20 years. They only matched winners 8 times in those two decades. More recently, they've picked 6 of the last 8 winners.
The Art Director's Guild Awards are a great indicator. They've nominated the Oscar nominee each of the last 20 years and matched winners 13 times.

La La Land
BAFTA - Production Design - Nominee
ADG - Contemporary Production Design - Winner
La La Land will win this as part of a big sweep on Oscar night. That's a hunch. That said, it lost the BAFTA and, in 20 years, a contemporary production has never won the Oscar. The voters are period and fantasy crazy. That's not encouraging.

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
BAFTA - Production Design - Winner
ADG - Fantasy Production Design - Nominee
The BAFTA win is nice. But, ask yourself, does "Oscar winner Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" sound right to you?" I didn't think so.

Arrival
ADG - Fantasy Production Design - Nominee
Arrival got so many nominations that it seems like it could win something.

Passengers
ADG - Fantasy Production Design - Winner
Passengers did beat two other Oscar nominees for the ADG award and that is a good looking spaceship that did a lot of the work for the story.

Hail, Caesar!
BAFTA - Production Design - Nominee
ADG - Period Production Design - Nominee
This is the first time a Coen brothers movie has even been nominated for production design since Barton Fink in 1991 and that didn't win the Oscar either. I really liked the production design for this movie, but it feels like an Oscar afterthought.

Oscar Predictions: Best Visual Effects

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.

Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts
Introduction & Documentary Feature
Foreign Film

Glossary:
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
VES - Visual Effects Guild's Award

Last year, the Visual Effects award was the biggest surprise of the night. The only way to predict Ex Machina would win was the roll of a dice. There's a worry that it could happen again this year. I'm assuming it was a fluke though, because, well, thinking otherwise would defeat the purpose of these posts.
The BAFTA award for Visual Effects is the more reliable precursor. It's nominated the eventual Oscar winner 19 times in the last 20 years and predicted the winner 13 of those times. Even better, it's called 12 of the last 15 Oscar winners.
The Visual Effects Society Awards are tricky. They give out many awards, ranging from animated performance to created environments to effect simulations. The the most predictive for the Oscar is the award for Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature. Of the 14 years they been handing out awards before this year, that award has matched the Oscar winner 9 times and at least nominated the Oscar winner 12 times.

The Jungle Book
BAFTA - Visual Effects - Winner
VES - Visual Effects (Live-Action) - Winner
The BAFTA and VES winners have agreed with each other 11 times before this year. 10 of those times, that movie also won the Oscar for Visual Effects. The one exception? That would be last year, when The Force Awakens was beaten by Ex Machina. Still, it's hard to watch The Jungle Book and not assume it is a lock. It's on that level of past winners like Gravity, Life of Pi, Inception, or Avatar.

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story
BAFTA - Visual Effects - Nominee
VES - Visual Effects (Live-Action) - Nominee
Like The Jungle Book, Rogue One was all over the VES awards. Even though it came away empty handed [for the awards I tracked], I'm still putting it with the next best odds. It could be a make-up call for not picking The Force Awakens last year. That isn't the norm for the Oscars, but it's possible that they might decide Star Wars needs a win.

Kubo and the Two Strings
VES - Visual Effects (Animated) - Winner
Animated movie almost never get recognized for their visual effects. It last happened over two decades ago with The Nightmare Before Christmas (which didn't win). I don't think its odds are very good, but it could win just for being different.

Doctor Strange
BAFTA - Visual Effects - Nominee
VES - Visual Effects (Live-Action) - Nominee
Here's a tid-bit of knowledge. The last Marvel movie to win the Visual Effects Oscar was Spider-Man 2 back in 2004. Doctor Strange is the best nominee Marvel's had in a while. I'm pretty sure voters will look at it as too similar to something like Inception to give it the win.

Deepwater Horizon
It actually got a couple secondary wins from the VES awards. I also wouldn't be against the film winning. It just doesn't seem all that likely.

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Oscar Predictions: Best Foreign Film

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.

Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts
Introduction & Documentary Feature

Glossary:
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
Golden Globe - Presented by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association  Award

The Foreign film category is tough, partly because I've rarely seen more than one of the nominees. That's a problem, because there aren't many precursor awards of note.
The BAFTA award is very unreliable because their idea of foreign is different than in the U.S. Very often, an Oscar nominee one year isn't eligible until the next year by the BAFTAs. The last two years, the BAFTA winner was from the previous year's Oscar pool. The hard numbers are that they've only even nominated the Oscar winner on the right year 10 of the last 20 years. They've only called the winner 5 times in those two decades.
You'd think the Golden Globes would be better at this, given than they are handed out by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. And they are better than the BAFTAs. They've called 10 of the last 20 winners of the Oscar and at least nominated the Oscar winner 14 times over that span. They are on quite a hot streak right now, calling 4 of the last 5 winners.

Toni Erdmann
BAFTA - Foreign Language Film - Nominee
Golden Globe - Foreign Film - Nominee
Well, the Globe Winner, Elle, wasn't nominated for the Oscar and the BAFTA winner, Son of Saul, won last year's Oscar. In lieu of a win, I'll go with nominations. Toni Erdmann is the only nominee recognized this year by both the Globes and BAFTAs. Also, I looked to Metacritic. Normally, that's an awful idea for this. Oscars go to agreeable films more than critically adored films. Metacritic is helpful for this Oscar though*. I looked back a few years and only very highly rated nominees on Metacritic won the Oscar. Not always the highest rated, but highly rated. Since 2011, the lowest rated winner was The Great Beauty (86). That immediately narrows the field down to two movies this year, and Toni Erdmann (94) is easily the highest rated. This isn't perfect either, because I don't know what the ratings looked like before the Oscars in past years. Perhaps the winners get a boost after the fact. It's still hard to call anything else the front runner though.

*For the record, I looked into RottenTomatoes, but those ratings are too forgiving to pull anything from them.

The Salesman
Golden Globe - Foreign Film - Nominee
It's the only other movie with a precursor nomination, it's from the director of previous winner The Separation, and it barely meets the 86 rating threshold I noticed on Metacritic.

A Man Called Ove
I've heard people call this the front runner for the category. I don't see it. It has no precursor nominations and at 69, it's the lowest rated nominee on Metacritic since Kon-Tiki in 2012. Granted, I haven't seen any of these movies, so I could be missing something.

Land of Mine
We are no longer in the days of WWII = Oscar.

Tanna
I know the least about this of any of the nominees and have no reason to think anyone else will vote for it.

Oscar Predictions: Introduction & Best Documentary Feature

The Oscars are coming up yet again. The guilds, Globes, BAFTAs, and critics have all made their picks. Now it's my turn to figure out what it all means with my multi-part Oscar predictions.
I'm going to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated and won elsewhere, and order the nominee from who I think is most to least likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean I'll be informed. Wish me luck.

---

Before I get to that though, I want to explain my methodology a bit. There are many, many awards given out before the Oscars. I don't use them all for my predictions. That's because some precursors are better than others. Critics are essentially useless. There's too many different critic groups giving out awards. They vary wildly in winners, nominees, and if they even bother to announce nominees. The Critics Choice Awards tries to combine all the citric groups into a single event. That ceremony has been far too inconsistent over the years. Categories change, split, or disappear far too often. Bigger picture though, critical consensus doesn't match the industry consensus very often. A movie (say, Boyhood) gobbling up critical awards gives the false impression that it's an Oscar favorite, when it often can be something else (Birdman, in this example), that takes home the Oscar. The National Board of Review only hands out wins, not nominations, which also isn't very helpful for how I do my examinations. I worked hard to sift through the Satellite Awards this year. Ultimately, they weren't consistent enough as predictors nor popular enough to be considered influencers. The Gotham and Independent Spirit Awards only focus on Independent movies. All of these awards certainly play into the conversation. Critical favorites often do indicate a general consensus and help point out sleepers. Certainly, if an indie movie is going to win an Oscar, losing out on the indie awards is a bad sign. I'll mention these things if they come up, but I'm mainly sticking with the list of awards I trust.

What is that list? Well, I'm including a glossary of the awards that matter for each category, but it's basically the Golden Globes, the BAFTA Awards, and the assorted guild awards. The Golden Globes are too visible to ignore. They aren't greatly predictive, but their influence is hard to ignore (Meryl Streep likely wouldn't've been nominated this year without her Golden Globes speech). The BAFTA Awards are about as thorough as the Oscars in terms of matching categories and have, especially in recent years, taken steps to match the Oscar results more often. The guilds are a great reflection of how the branches will vote. For example, who knows Sound Mixing better than the Sound Mixers guild? Many voters belong to both the guilds and the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences, so that's helpful. Also, I like following awards that list their nominees, not just the winners. That way, you know what a movie won against. If a film wins the BAFTA for Costume Design but none of the other nominees are nominated for the Oscar, it doesn't tell me very much. None of these are perfect. Nothing couldn've predicted the Ex Machina win for Visual Effects last year. However, you'll get more right than wrong by reading the award tea leaves beforehand. Lastly, I only look back 20 years for most awards. There's a couple reasons for that. One is that it's about how far back the SAG awards go, which relates to the categories most people care about. Another is that so much change happens in the Oscar voting and membership over time that there's diminishing returns the further back you go. 20 seems like a good place to stop.

Finally, you should be able to figure this out on your own, but when I refer to a year, I am speaking of the year being awarded. So, these predictions are for the 2016 Oscars. When I refer to 2015, I mean the 88th Academy Awards, which took place in February 2016, honoring the best films of 2015. I find it easier to talk like that because it's the films that matter.

---

Previously:
Oscar Nomination Thoughts

Glossary:
Eddie -  American Cinema Editors Award
PGA - Producers Guild of America Award
BAFTA - British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
DGA - Director's Guild of America

For a while, the Oscar for Documentary Feature was very difficult to predict. The precursor awards almost never agreed with one another, only occasionally nominated the same features as the Oscars, and seldom picked the same winner as the Oscars. In 2009 though, The Cove dominated the season on the way to Oscar glory. Since then, with one exception (2011), it's be a predictable award.
The BAFTA Award is the newest precursor. This will be the sixth year they've had the Documentary Feature award. They've matched the Oscar winner in 3 of the last 4 years. The one year it missed (2013) was because the winner, Twenty Feet From Stardom, wasn't eligible until 2014 for the BAFTA. That will probably matter this year.
The PGA isn't great at all. This is their tenth year with a Documentary award. It has matched the Oscar winner only four times, normally when there is already a relative consensus. When they miss, they miss big too. In nine tries so far, they've nominated the Oscar winner just five times.
The DGA has been handing out a documentary award for at least two decades. You can entirely ignore it until 2003. It's at least nominated the Oscar winner 9 times since then. Of the two decades I tracked, the first time the Directors actually picked the Oscar winner was 2009. Since then, they've been 4-3. They were the only group who didn't have Amy winning last year, which is odd.
Lastly, there's the ACE award. That's for editing, which is a key part of documentary filmmaking. It's no surprise then, that the ACE award is the most useful Oscar predictor. They have picked the last four winners and 8 of the last 11 winners.

O.J: Made in America
ACE - Edited Documentary - Winner
DGA - Directed Documentary - Winner
PGA - Documentary Feature - Winner
I don't know why this failed to even get the BAFTA nomination. The four times that at least three of the precursor awards went to the same movie, it also won the Oscar. No reason to expect that trend to change now.

13th
BAFTA - Documentary Feature - Winner
ACE - Edited Documentary - Nominee
The BAFTA win means significantly less when you consider that it was the only Oscar nominee in the BAFTA field. Still, a win is a win. Maybe the Oscar voters would rather vote for the documentary about race relations in the U.S. that's 5 hours shorter than the front runner and from the highly respected director of Selma.

Life, Animated
DGA - Directed Documentary - Nominee
PGA - Documentary Feature - Nominee
It's the only other nominee with two precursor nods. It loses whenever it's against O.J. though.

I Am Not Your Negro
DGA - Directed Documentary - Nominee
I know it's not exactly the same as O.J. or 13th, but it's topically similar enough to those two, that I'm not sure who would be left to vote for this.

Fire at Sea
The only times a documentary with no precursor nomination wins this is when there is no clear front runner.

Monday, February 13, 2017

Movie Reaction: John Wick: Chapter 2

Formula: John Wick - 1 irredeemable act

Action movies evolve in predictable ways. The 70s were full of gritty heroes like Dirty Harry. When those got too serious, audiences turned to over the top shoot-em-ups like the Rambo movies and Commando. Eventually, that got old and Die Hard grounded things a little more. That is, until we got sick of that and The Matrix said "screw physics" and went superhuman. The response to that was the Bourne movies, with their shaky cam realism. It's no surprise that The Expendables brought a brief resurgence to the 80's excessiveness after that. John Wick feels like the natural next step after the Bourne era though. He's essentially Jason Bourne with a license and proclivity to kill. Not maim. Not incapacitate. Kill until dead.

The thing that made the first John Wick so enjoyable is also the reason why no one ran out to see it. It looked generic. It's a lean action movie that only has a plot as a device to get from one well-staged fight scene to another. It's hard to sell a movie on being well made. John Wick is technically just a man. He's not Neo, but he's spoken of like he's Neo. And that's why the character works. The whole movie is built around the idea the John Wick is indestructible. He's the main character in a first person shooter. When he's shot, it hurts him, but he keeps going. He has to reload his ammo one clip at a time, like anyone else. He's just better than everyone else. The mistake of watching a John Wick movie is wondering 'if' not 'how'*.

*How he survives, not if he survives.

Chapter 2 picks up shortly after the first movie. After retrieving his car that was stolen in the first movie, John (Keanu Reeves) returns to his home with his new dog, ready to retire again. No sooner does the cement dry than he gets a knock on his door from a man requesting that he makes good on a blood oath and do one last mission. After some cajoling, John reluctantly agrees to one last hit. This quickly spirals out of control and John has to shoot his way out of the situation across two continents. He's chased primarily by two assassins (Common and Ruby Rose) and hundreds of henchmen. He employs the help of people like Ian McShane, Lawrence Fishburne, John Leguizamo, and Lance Reddick along the way. The movie is strategic to not kill anyone they might want to have return later and is liberal with head shots and double-taps for everyone else. It's also determined to let John off the hook as much as possible when it comes to doing bad things (i.e. He's only doing it because he's been backed into a corner). Derek Kolstad (writer) and Chad Stahelski (director) have fun expanding out this assassin underworld. It's all over the top but in a self-aware way. Every single thing about the movie, including the end, is designed to allow many future chapters. And I'm fine with that.

As you'd expect from a film directed by a former stuntman (Keanu's former stunt-double, in fact), the stunt work is great throughout. Stahelski tries to stay with single shots as long as possible. The blocking and camera placement is always spot on. Despite a lot happening, the geography of a given scene is easy to keep track of. I'll happily take 'competent' over 'showing off' when it comes to fight scenes like this.

Spoilers don't matter for a movie like this, so there's one thing I need to make very clear. Nothing bad happens to the dog this time. They learned their lesson. It was an effective motivation in the first movie, but dipping back into that well would've been excessive. You can watch this one guilt-free.

John Wick: Chapter 2 isn't going to make a believer out of anyone. If gunplay in movies isn't your thing, this will be an interminable slog. Otherwise, it's perfectly enjoyable. While I've never minded Keanu as a screen presence the way others do, there isn't enough "Keanu acting" to scare anyone away. It's basically a more expansive version of Chapter 1 and that's all it's trying to be.

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend

Movie Reaction: The Lego Batman Movie

Formula: The Dark Knight * The Lego Movie

The Lego movie franchise is a wonderful thing. They are movies that I assumed could never happen. In a world of intellectual property rights and competing movie studios, there's really no such thing as crossover. It took a decade of bad Spider-Man movies finally get Sony to let up on the rights enough to partner with Disney. And that's under the same studio banner (Marvel). The idea of Batman, Voldemort, Sauron, and Daleks all inhabiting the same story is nothing short of fan fiction. Yet, Lego found a way. However this legal loophole happened that gives Lego the freedom to use Lego forms of licensed characters however they want, I'm so thankful for it. Legos have always represented unfettered imagination and their movies reflect that too.

Lego Batman is an especially weird sequel. The character Urkeled his way into a standalone movie. Or maybe Minioned is the better verb? Regardless, I don't think The Lego Batman Movie was in the original rollout plans for the Lego Movie Universe or LMU (not to be confused with Loyola Marymount University). The movie works much better than I expected. Will Arnett's Batman* was a great scene-stealer in The Lego Movie but that doesn't always translate into being a good lead. He's fleshed out enough in this installment to make it work.

*At this point, just assume the word 'Lego' has been added before any character name.

"More is better" is the right approach for this movie. The anarchy is the appeal. They throw everything they can at the story and eventually it works. If one Batman villain isn't enough, get all of them. If Batman villains aren't enough, use every other major villain you can think of. Then layer it deep with meta-humor and fourth-wall breaking and there's the movie: a chaotic, entertaining mess with just enough story to keep it moving.

The voice cast is impressive. It feels a level below how star studded The Lego Movie's cast was*, but when you've got everyone from Michael Cera to Ralph Fiennes to Garfunkel & Oates to Siri to Billy Dee Williams to Mariah Carey, it's hard to complain. I want to give a special shout out to Doug Benson's Bane. It's a throwaway part, but it made me laugh every time he said anything with that bad Tom Hardy impression.

*Then again, Chris Pratt didn't take over Hollywood until after The Lego Movie came out, so I could be rewriting history with my memory.

I can't tell if the animation was less impressive because it wasn't as good this time or if I'm just used to the style in a way that I wasn't with the 2014 movie. Lego Batman had a larger budget (still only $80 million to $60 in 2014), so it's probably the latter case. It still looks good. Just, no scenes like the water storm one in The Lego Movie that broke my brain.

You'll notice that I've gone all this time without mentioning the plot. That's because there's no need to talk about it. It's generic and familiar. There's five people credited with the screenplay, which supports my theory that this was written in a writers room like a sitcom episode. It is dense with jokes that hit on different levels and that's all that matters.

The Lego Batman Movie may be even more crowd pleasing than the first movie by being just about the humor and animation and dropping the parts of The Lego Movie that bothered some people. All the parts work as well as I could hope for a movie I didn't think needed to happen. Lego Batman may not be the sequel that we need, but it is the sequel we deserve. 

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend 

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Delayed Reaction: Goodnight Mommy

The Pitch: Two brothers think their mother has been replaced by an alien.

I feel like I say this a lot, but I have no memory of putting this in my Netflix queue or moving it up the list. I vaguely remember seeing a trailer for it, but that's about it. Well, way to go Germany, you scared me away from having kids.

This is a messed up little movie. I loved the twist at the end about Lukas. That didn't even occur to me and it really should've. Veronika Franz and Severin Fiala fill this this with frightening imagery and they like to sit with uncomfortable moments for a while. There's a few times that the violence is a little too real and intimate for me, like when Elias cuts their mother's mouth open. I certainly won't be trusting kids around me with any sharp instruments for a while, or falling asleep around them, or even giving them any reason to suspect something ill of me.

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend