I've always been a little hesitant about Noah
Baumbach as a filmmaker. Almost on accident, I've managed to see nearly all of
his movies. The thing I liked most about him for a while was that he worked
with Greta Gerwig (Greenberg, Frances Ha, Mistress America).
She humanized a lot of his work. He has a tendency to write insufferable
characters. Gerwig is so innately likable as a performer, that she endeared me
to characters despite their flaws. She's not in Baumbach's debut movie Kicking
and Screaming back in 1995, but that movie has other rough edges that make
how I feel about his characters secondary. The key movies going into Marriage
Story are The Squid and the Whale (also about a divorce) and The
Meyerowitz Stories (his next most recent movie). I hated The Squid and
the Whale, which felt like a mean-spirited therapy session that I was being
forced to sit through. I hated all the characters and suffered through that
movie. That made me less than excited to hear that Baumbach was making another
movie about a divorce. However, The Meyerowitz Stories was encouraging.
He found ways to make prickly characters without turning me off or having
Gerwig as a safety net. Thankfully, Marriage Story is much more like The
Meyerowitz Stories.
I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to get into the
internet debate that everyone is having about this movie: Whose fault is it?
Consider yourself warned. Marriage Story begins with Charlie (Adam
Driver) and Nicole (Scarlett Johansson) already decided to get a divorce. She's
an actress. He's a theater director. They have a kid and work together. It's
all somewhat civil (and, not surprisingly, autobiographical for Baumbach). They
are determined to make this divorce as easy as possible since they seem to have
no ill will toward each other. Then, Nicole goes to Los Angeles to shoot a
pilot that gets picked up to series, and thus begins the death march. Despite
all their efforts, the divorce proceedings get contentious and expensive. They
each bring in pricey lawyers (Laura Dern, Alan Alda, Ray Liotta) and feelings
are hurt.
There's an inherent imbalance to the story. Charlie
makes the marriage awful. Nicole makes the divorce awful. The problem is, the
movie is only about the divorce. That's the entire divide in a nutshell. And,
it's the difference between showing vs. telling. Charlie was clearly stubborn
in the marriage. He didn't listen to what Nicole wanted. He was unfaithful at
some point. I can understand why she'd want to leave him. In the movie, we
mostly hear about all that. Meanwhile, Nicole clearly escalates the
divorce. She moves the kid across the country, hires a lawyer, and hides behind
legalities to avoid discussions. We see the strain this puts Charlie
under in the movie. Seeing is more powerfully than telling. This makes the overall
story a little less interesting. I would've liked the imbalances and
escalations to be a little more discrete. Since we're mainly seeing the
struggles Charlie is going through, it's harder to make something like Laura
Dern's big speech about the imbalance of parental perceptions feel earned. 40
years ago, Kramer vs. Kramer went overboard to give the father a fighting
chance in the custody hearings. Marriage Story doesn't have to stack the
deck quite as much, but it still works too hard to make sure the audience has
sympathy for Driver.
But, Jesus, these performances are great. Adam
Driver and Scarlett Johansson both get some amazing monologues and cries. There
are some amazing bits of physical comedy, including one toward the end with
Driver that's both hilarious and heartbreaking. Merritt Wever is deliriously
good in her few scenes. All the lawyers (Dern, Alda, Liotta) cover the spectrum
of that profession beautifully (maybe not accurately, but beautifully). Julie
Hagerty as Johansson's mom brings some very good Julie Hagerty energy. Noah
Baumbach's greatest strength has always been his ability to get his actors to
really tear into their characters.
The big knock I've heard about Marriage Story
sounds more like a humblebrag in its favor. The movie is uncomfortably accurate
about how difficult a divorce is. I've literally heard that the big Oscar
concern for it is that voters aren't interested in reliving their own divorces.
My biggest issue is the narrative imbalance, and I'm not really sure the movie has
anything new to say. It felt a lot like a checklist of points. Infidelity,
check. Failed mediation, check. The kid stuck in the middle, check. The father
feeling distant, check. The big fight they should've had before the divorce,
check. Or maybe the divorce is too "Hollywood". And, I don't mean
that it's too neat. I mean that the particulars of this divorce are too
specific to a certain upper-crust experience to relate to it. I mean, the
division of assets discussion involves a MacArthur Genius Grant and points on a
TV show. The hardship of Driver's character splitting time between New York and
Los Angeles means his Broadway play failed. I'm about as much of a coastal
elite ally as you're going to find in a flyover state, but damn, at least try
to tone things down a bit.
Still, the performances are so good, that it's hard
to complain about the rest.
Verdict: Strongly Recommend
No comments:
Post a Comment