The original Black Christmas is a somewhat
forgotten but highly influential horror movie that either jump started or
created (depending on who you ask) the slasher genre years before Halloween
made it the dominant horror genre for over a decade. You may remember that
there was a remake of Black Christmas in 2006 that doesn't exist
anymore. Philosophers have actually updated the old saying about a tree falling
in the woods to "If Black Christmas (2006) was released and no one
remembers it, does it still exist?"* Just 13 years later, we get yet
another version of Black Christmas that's determined to test the limits
of diminishing returns. For some reason, people really love finding a way to
mix horror with Christmas. There's probably a reason there aren't a lot of
classics that have done it successfully.
*That said, pretty good cast for that movie.
The basics of the movie are pretty much the same as
previous versions. Sorority girls start getting murdered around campus. Imogen
Poots plays the lead character, who spends a long time being the only one
suspicious about all these disappearances right before Christmas break.
Eventually, the murders come to light and Imogen and her sisters have to fight
for their lives.
If you are sitting here thinking "that doesn't
sound like enough to sustain a 90 minute movie" then you'd be right. This
version of Black Christmas fills in time by talking a lot about college
rape culture. Which, in a broad sense, cool. Horror is a good way to be
transgressive and address social issues in simplified terms that encourage a
deeper discussion. I'm glad the movie tried to address this real horror by
filtering it through this sensationalized premise. However...how can I say this
right? The movie thinks it's a 400 level course when it's actually a 100 level
survey. Do you know that feeling when you hear a person use a smart word that
you know they just learned that day? That's how this whole movie felt. I'll be
generous and suggest that it was an intentional movie. These are all college
students, after all, so they would talk about this complex topic like they are
working off a checklist of buzz words. College student are a great source of
knowledge without nuance. Secretly though, I just think it's a screenplay that
they didn't work very hard on (or got noted to death by studio heads).
My biggest issue really is that the movie undercuts
its own message. Consider this your spoiler alert. So, the movie takes a crazy
left turn into being about a magic Men's Rights cult run by the fraternities. A
statue of the college's founder has the power to turn all men into their
"true alphas" which leads to them killing all the strong-minded women
on campus. That pretty much lets every male character off the hook though.
These men aren't bad because of toxic masculinity or entitlement. They're bad
because a magical force made them evil. It essentially undoes all the
discussion from the first half of the movie.
Also, the movie just isn't very suspenseful. The
deaths aren't memorable. The best characters all die early. The plot doesn't
make a lot of sense. It's an easy movie to watch (it's short and
uncomplicated), but it's not very good. The messaging is mixed and unfocused.
It's not even sure what kind of movie it wants to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment