I'm going
to go through each of the Oscar categories, tell you what has been nominated
and won elsewhere, and order the nominees from who I think is most to least
likely to win on Oscar night. That doesn't mean I'll be right, but it does mean
I'll be informed. Wish me luck.
---
Animated Feature & International Film
Glossary:
BAFTA -
British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards
ACS -
American Cinematographer Society Award
Eddie
- American Cinema Editors Award
(In Order of Likelihood)
1. 1917
ASC -
Cinematography – Winner
BAFTA - Cinematography
- Winner
2. Joker
ASC -
Cinematography – Nominee
BAFTA -
Cinematography - Nominee
3. The Irishman
ASC -
Cinematography – Nominee
BAFTA - Cinematography
- Nominee
BAFTA -
Cinematography - Nominee
ASC -
Cinematography – Nominee
The two precursor awards are only
somewhat useful for determining the Oscar winner here. The BAFTA winner has
matched the Oscar winner 10 of the last 20 years. The ASC winner has only won
the Oscar 11 of the last 20 times. 8 of the last 10 times the BAFTA and ACS
agreed on a winner, that movie also won the Oscar. In other words, even when
there appears to be a consensus, it’s no guarantee.
That said, it’s hard to see Roger
Deakin’s (1917) losing this. He is a legend who only got his first Oscar two
years ago. The single-take effect of 1917 is considered a feat of
cinematography above all else. There isn’t any other movie that makes sense to
win this.
I suppose it could go Joker’s way if
that movie really dominates the ceremony. Same with The Irishman. The
Lighthouse could win this. It would be kind of like Pan’s Labyrinth’s surprise
win in 2005. That’s pretty rare though. And, again, Once Upon a Time in
Hollywood seems like an also-ran in the field.
(In Order of Likelihood)
BAFTA -
Film Editing – Winner
Eddie -
Drama Film Editing – Nominee
2. Jojo Rabbit
BAFTA -
Film Editing – Nominee
Eddie -
Comedy/Musical Film Editing - Winner
3. Parasite
Eddie -
Drama Film Editing – Winner
4. Joker
BAFTA - Film
Editing – Nominee
Eddie -
Drama Film Editing – Nominee
5. The Irishman
BAFTA -
Film Editing – Nominee
Eddie -
Drama Film Editing – Nominee
*Screenplay and Acting awards are split up,
thus making no single of these awards more reliable.
Here’s what I do know though. The BAFTA award
isn’t very useful. Only 8 of the last 20 BAFTA winners also won the Oscar. The
Eddie Award is much more reliable thanks to having a split award. 15 of the
last 20 movies to win an Eddie also won the Oscar. And all 20 winners were at
least nominated for an Eddie. It’s only 19/20 for the BAFTAs because they
failed to nominate the aforementioned Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Still, only
17 of the last 20 Oscar winners have won an Eddie or the BAFTA award. So, you can
never feel too certain. A last connection that I’ve found. There’s a strong
correlation between the Sound Mixing Oscar and the Film Editing Oscar for some
reason. The last 6 years, the same movie has won both Oscars.
OK, time to explain my picks. Most of the bad
press The Irishman received had to do with the excessive length. It’s hard to
see that winning a Film Editing Oscar. The last movie that was longer than The
Irishman to win this Oscar was Ben-Hur in 1959. Think about that for a minute.
Although, 2003’s The Return of the King wasn’t too far off. Again, the looming
threat of a Joker sweep gives it some juice here, and it is also nominated for
Sound Mixing. The Eddie win for Parasite and the general enthusiasm for the
movie has to help it. As we’re repeatedly reminded though, real Best Picture
contention is not a prerequisite for the Film Editing Oscar. I like that Jojo
Rabbit got a BAFTA nomination as well as the Eddie win.
Ford v Ferrari has the nominations. The BAFTA
win isn’t quite as important, but that didn’t stop Hacksaw Ridge (2016) or
Whiplash (2014). I’m actually putting a lot of value in that Sound Mixing
connection. Ford v Ferrari is one of my final two for the Sound Mixing Oscar,
so a Film Editing win here would make a lot of sense. That does mean I think
Sound Mixing and Film Editing will finally split this year. That has a lot to
do with the fact that the specific nature of 1917 makes it practically
ineligible for Film Editing in the mind of a lot of Oscar voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment