Back on track. A week later and I'm ready with the next edition of this.
Past Purges
The Bridge "The Acorn"
I'm finding this show hard to write about because I don't fully understanding what is happening. Each of the stories right now exists on the fringe of the other stories. The bank offers the first convergence of them with Benjamin's suicide bringing Marco and Sonya and Daniel and Adriana together.
The reporters come to Benjamin about the money laundering. Realizing that he doesn't have much time before the police, or worse, the cartel gets him, Benjamin decides to off himself. Why he opted to go outside and scar the sign holder is something I cannot explain. You have to feel bad for any guy who is called an asshole in the final words he ever hears. I share Daniel's opinion, personally: "All I'm saying is blowing your brains out at work is a rookie move. You know, have the decency to kill yourself in your own bathtub. Grab a handful of pills, a fifth of Stoli, and throw in a little Capt. Beefheart and you enjoy the ride." Based on Marco's talk with Daniel and Adiana, I don't expect them to work together from here. It looks more like a momentary overlap.
Meanwhile, Charlotte and Ray are hiding poorly from the cartel after last week's "heist", Eleanor is making backroom deals with Fausto to see some caged man, and Marco is struggling with his allegiances. I'll admit, I spend most of the scenes with the Spanish subtitles reading, so I didn't realize until now that the Internal Affairs guy and the CEO were different people. This certainly makes Marco's situation a lot less hopeless and it really is a matter of time before he lets Sonya in on it. Hopefully, things will start to tie together more in the coming weeks. While I don't think everything has to be tied together, at some point you wonder why these stories are all on the same show if they are so different.
Married "The Getaway"
This week was about two couple who needed to remember that they work in their own specific way. Russ and Lina are tired of each other. If one thing has been made clear in these first three episodes, it's that. They love each other but that's almost beside the point. The rest of life has beaten them down. The episode begins with them nipping their biggest problem in the bud, so to speak, with Russ preparing for a vasectomy. As sitcom tropes demand, Russ is not pleased with the idea and Lina holds the pain of pregnancy over him. However she's not dense to the psychological effects of this on Russ, so they plan a romantic getaway. As further sitcom tropes demand, they get a room next to a younger, mirror couple who have no sexual problems, unlike Russ and Lina, who are rather pathetic in their attempts to have sex. Over time, we see the kinks in the young couple's armor and our leads bond over recognizing that they were that young and stupid one day, although Lina points out to Russ, "Baby, you're still that dumb".
Meanwhile, one of the defining characteristics of Jess so far is that she's married to an old man. We get to meet the old man this week and he's played by none other than TV's Paul Reiser. It starts off looking very bad. Jess has been sexting with the neighbor who looks to have run out on his wife. The wife confronts Jess about this. Together, the wife, Jess, and Reiser sext the husband in an attempt to get a response. It's all painfully awkward and confusing because Reiser is completely relaxed throughout the whole thing. By the end, it's all resolved with a simple "I know who I married" from him.
Both couples don't function in the traditional sense. Russ and Lina bicker constantly and Jess freely invites the advances of other men. Then again, neither couple is in danger of splitting up (partly because, well, what's the name of the show). Russ and Lina thrive on the fact that they know the other person will put up with all their worst habits. Jess and her husband are secure in what they have, so even something like a little sexting isn't a threat. I still don't know if I like this show, but it is doing a good job following through with the mission statement, that marriage isn't supposed to be simple or pretty.
You're the Worst "Keys Open Doors"
I've had to change my expectations for this series a couple times already. The first episode went out of it's way to make Jimmy and Gretchen the worst people. The second episode uncomfortably inserted scenes to remind us that they are supposed to be the worst. This episode didn't really have any of that. They are a legit couple at this point. Neither fully understands what that means, but they genuinely seem to like each other and barely put up a fight about what this is becoming. The Key issue is a legitimate concern, given that they haven't been dating that long, regardless of how comfortable they already are. I can't blame Jimmy for wanting to snoop in her phone, because that's just human nature. This is the second week in a row in which Gretchen is purposely leaving Jimmy in the dark, so it's starting to seem more like "He's the worst, and she's just bad enough to not find someone better". This isn't necessarily a bad thing because I do like Gretchen and Jimmy. Edgar is growing on me and Lindsay has potential. Once they settle on a tone for the series, I see myself really enjoying it.
Girl Meets World "Girl Meets the Truth"
This show is always going to be too broad for my taste. That's the nature of the beast. What it doesn't have to do is try too hard and this episode tried WAY too hard.
The episode begins in the middle of a Romeo and Juliet performance that Farkle takes over as a way to get a kiss with Riley [and Maya]. He's cast as a spear carrier, so he already should know that he's not that great at this acting thing. Then, because Riley omits telling him that he was bad, he forsakes everything else to be an actor, burning bridges with the Chess and Chemistry clubs along the way. That's an awful lot of delusion to credit only to Riley.
Then there's Maya and the locket. We need way more context to know why Riley is pressing Maya so hard about it. Maya has a mom too who could but her stuff, doesn't she? Even when Maya breaks and admits that she took it from a lost and found after waiting months to see if it got claimed that sounded like a legit excuse. It's not the moral quandary that Riley makes it out to be. Having the family be at the train station at the end, literally standing in the locket picture formation was laying it on too thick.
Speaking of laying it on too thick, Corey should know better about the chicken. That was clearly a story written so they could come up with a parallel to Riley's. Some things that bothered me about that include: Topanga never even bothered to explain that chicken (which leads me to believe she made it badly on purpose), why it would take Corey that long to figure out what was really angering Topanga, and, most importantly, when Topanga can even find time to cook, given her job as a lawyer who I'm certain brings in the money to pay for most of the apartment.
Moving beyond the "too much" discussion, I have some more basic logistical issues. Lucas and Riley were in a production of Romeo & Juliet for the school (bravo for them, by the way). I assume they practiced beforehand. Wouldn't there have been a kiss then? Farkle interrupts the actual performance where Lucas cedes the kiss to him. Did the kiss never happen in the play? I don't understand how Farkle's chin kiss is Riley's first kiss. It doesn't make sense to me.
As a whole, this episode was lazier in the way prior episodes haven't been. Hopefully we can move back to easy sentiment and simple jokes for next week.
Halt and Catch Fire "1984"
This is a show about three people: a salesman, a technician, and a programmer.
No...a motivator, a creator, and an artist.
No...the past, the present, and the future.
Sure. Let's go with that.
Joe is IBM. Despite all his cunning and craft, his big idea, his dream, is nothing more than an IBM clone in a pretty package. Gordon has his pulse on what computers are in 1984. He made the best machine he could with the available technology of at the time. Cameron has always seen what's next, and even if she fails, it will be because she's thinking too far ahead, not behind.
The finale (of the season and probably the series) shifts everything forward to reflect their roles. Joe can't stand the thought of being the "old guard" and would rather watch it all burn than accept it. Now that the Giant is a success, Gordon can already see that he's becoming a thing of the past, starring blankly after being asked the dreaded and inevitable question: "What's next?". Cameron is watching the future become a reality, starting Mutiny and bringing the impossible to the forefront. Symbolically, it's a satisfying end to this chapter. I only wish that the truth of the situation would've been addressed along with the symbolism.
None of this would've happened without Joe. Without him Gordon would be a miserable failure still and Cameron would be listless and disgusted by the world. Those are facts. No, Joe isn't the greatest personnel guy. He talks down to people and isn't afraid to humiliate them. He pushes everyone and demands success. There wouldn't be a show without him. Gordon learns to accept what Joe is, and while we don't get to see his immediate reaction to torching the first shipment, I'm sure it wasn't more than "that sounds like Joe". I'm more troubled by Cameron's response. She's never played the part of the rebellious daughter to Joe more than when she told him off. I understand that her "pure artistry" was ignored in a nuts and bolts decision. She can't be that dense and then a couple scenes later have the foresight to need Donna to keep Mutiny from imploding. It makes me look forward to the first time she has to make a hard decision in her job.
I'm not sure that I ever got a handle on what this show is, and from the treatment of the characters in the finale, I don't think the showrunners did either. This is too quick to be tearing the team apart. The show didn't come together until two episodes ago when they went into full caper mode and used their individual skills to finally release the Giant. The best part of this episode was seeing Gordon and Joe team up on Cardiff to keep the operation running. They don't all have to be tortured all the time. Just because the characters are on Mad Men doesn't mean they need to here. On a story level, this was a satisfying ending. On a character level is was anything but.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Delayed Reaction: Madagascar Escape 2 Africa
The Pitch: Basically, Madagascar with a classic 180 reversal. Rush Hour 1 and 2 follow the same principle. Now that I think of it, both Madagascar and Rush Hour got to Europe for the third movie...
What Took Me So Long: I hadn't seen the first, so this was a non-starter.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) This is arguably the most successful animated franchise of the past decade (maybe Ice Age would disagree) and I can see why. The formula is there with the good voice actors and plenty of material to riff off. I assume kids love the penguins more than I do which is why they are so prominent in the movie. When you told me that Bernie Mac was voicing someone's parent, I would've assumed it would be Rock's Marty. Apparently though, I'm racist. And, honestly, the zebras did all look the same to me, so this movie was very revealing.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: There's animated movies with depth and a range of audience and then there's animated movies that play to kids and maybe don't annoy parents. This is certainly in the latter category. You can either fault them for that or accept it. I accept it but also have no intent to ever see this again. I got the full effect with the first movie.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
What Took Me So Long: I hadn't seen the first, so this was a non-starter.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) This is arguably the most successful animated franchise of the past decade (maybe Ice Age would disagree) and I can see why. The formula is there with the good voice actors and plenty of material to riff off. I assume kids love the penguins more than I do which is why they are so prominent in the movie. When you told me that Bernie Mac was voicing someone's parent, I would've assumed it would be Rock's Marty. Apparently though, I'm racist. And, honestly, the zebras did all look the same to me, so this movie was very revealing.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: There's animated movies with depth and a range of audience and then there's animated movies that play to kids and maybe don't annoy parents. This is certainly in the latter category. You can either fault them for that or accept it. I accept it but also have no intent to ever see this again. I got the full effect with the first movie.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
Delayed Reaction: Death Becomes Her
The Pitch: Goldie Hawn and Meryl Streep play out a modern fable about aging in Hollywood.
What Took Me So Long: I'd seen enough of it for it to not quite belong on my "Movies I need to see" list but also not be considered a "Movie I've seen". Purgatory sucks, am I right?
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) This is such a delightfully twisted movie. The morale of the story is about a blunt as you get but it's pretty much perfect Zemekis: funny and original. They manage to do a lot with a cast basically limited to Goldie Hawn, Meryl Streep, Bruce Willis, and occasionally Isabella Rossellini. Meryl can make anything work, can't she?
Why I Wish I Hadn't: I'm not sure if the effects looked bad back in '92 but they don't hold up too well by today's standards. That is part of the charm of watching it now. I suppose you could say it takes a simple story and stretches it out a lot (perhaps too much), but it does it in an entertaining way, so I didn't mind. Such a strange and enjoyable movie.
Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend
What Took Me So Long: I'd seen enough of it for it to not quite belong on my "Movies I need to see" list but also not be considered a "Movie I've seen". Purgatory sucks, am I right?
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) This is such a delightfully twisted movie. The morale of the story is about a blunt as you get but it's pretty much perfect Zemekis: funny and original. They manage to do a lot with a cast basically limited to Goldie Hawn, Meryl Streep, Bruce Willis, and occasionally Isabella Rossellini. Meryl can make anything work, can't she?
Why I Wish I Hadn't: I'm not sure if the effects looked bad back in '92 but they don't hold up too well by today's standards. That is part of the charm of watching it now. I suppose you could say it takes a simple story and stretches it out a lot (perhaps too much), but it does it in an entertaining way, so I didn't mind. Such a strange and enjoyable movie.
Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend
Monday, August 4, 2014
Delayed Reaction: Disclosure
The Pitch: A man is sexually assaulted by a coworker. How unbelievable would that be?
What Took Me So Long: I watch the first half hour of it years ago and never revisited it when I realized it was more like Wall Street than Fatal Attraction.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) Demi Moore in her Striptese days is never to be ignored. That's a fact. Michael Douglas is obscenely great at playing a millionaire everyman. I can't think of anyone else who pulls that off as well. The social commentary about harassment in the workplace is pretty dated, but the larger story about Douglas' company is compelling enough with a couple twists I didn't expect.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: It's tough when the most interesting scene in the movie is in the first 30 minutes and the rest is essentially fallout. It tries admirably to keep being interesting but it's an uphill climb.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
What Took Me So Long: I watch the first half hour of it years ago and never revisited it when I realized it was more like Wall Street than Fatal Attraction.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) Demi Moore in her Striptese days is never to be ignored. That's a fact. Michael Douglas is obscenely great at playing a millionaire everyman. I can't think of anyone else who pulls that off as well. The social commentary about harassment in the workplace is pretty dated, but the larger story about Douglas' company is compelling enough with a couple twists I didn't expect.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: It's tough when the most interesting scene in the movie is in the first 30 minutes and the rest is essentially fallout. It tries admirably to keep being interesting but it's an uphill climb.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
Delayed Reaction: Kung Fu Panda 2
The Pitch: It'll be exactly like Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie.
What Took Me So Long: It looked exactly the same as Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) It was just like Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie. I liked the first movie well enough. Dreamworks is not a studio I hold in high regard so all I needed was a little mindless fun and that's what I got. The voice cast is strong. It's funny hearing Jack Black, David Cross, and Seth Rogen doing the voices because there's no way a live action movie with them would be anything other than an R rating. Even though she's actually not that big of a star in movies, it always feels like a big "get" to have Angelina Jolie in it.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: It was just like Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie. Seriously, the original was ok. This is very much a sequel brought about because the first did well, not because they found something in the story worth continuing. And, it isn't like the characters are so damn likable that I'm happy just to see them again (that's more How To Train Your Dragon's billing).
Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend
What Took Me So Long: It looked exactly the same as Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) It was just like Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie. I liked the first movie well enough. Dreamworks is not a studio I hold in high regard so all I needed was a little mindless fun and that's what I got. The voice cast is strong. It's funny hearing Jack Black, David Cross, and Seth Rogen doing the voices because there's no way a live action movie with them would be anything other than an R rating. Even though she's actually not that big of a star in movies, it always feels like a big "get" to have Angelina Jolie in it.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: It was just like Kung Fu Panda with just enough plot changed to technically make it a different movie. Seriously, the original was ok. This is very much a sequel brought about because the first did well, not because they found something in the story worth continuing. And, it isn't like the characters are so damn likable that I'm happy just to see them again (that's more How To Train Your Dragon's billing).
Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend
Sunday, August 3, 2014
Movie Reaction: Guardians of the Galaxy
Formula: The Avengers / Star Wars
Why I Saw It: At this point, if it's part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, I'm going to see it.
Cast: Winning. That's the best description I've found for the cast. Chris Pratt is a leading man in all the best ways. He brings all the Andy Dwyer likability you could want to Peter Quill and absolutely pulls off all the physicality of the role. Zoe Saldana has made a career out of roles like Gamora. I can't say how this is greatly different from The Losers or Columbiana. Then again, it doesn't need to be different. Somehow, they pull off Rocket Raccoon (voiced by Bradley Cooper) in a way that doesn't make him a joke, which is an achievement in and of itself. Dave Bautista is more than just "the strong guy" as Drax. He reminds me of The Rock with less smirking. Vin Diesel voices Groot, who I'd say is the fan favorite coming out the the movie. Lee Pace and Karen Gillan are the chief villains and do well in limited time. There are several others, including John C. Reilly, Glen Close, and Michael Rooker who are good as well.
Plot: This is the story of five galactic criminals who find themselves teaming up to save the galaxy. We begin with Peter Quill on Earth in 1988, featuring a rather heartbreaking origin story, before he's picked up by a space ship. Jump to the present and Quill is retrieving some sort of orb. He ends up in a prison, along with Gamora (after the orb), Rocket and Groot (after Quill), and Drax (after revenge). They end up bound together to split the bounty for this orb, which has greater significance than originally presented, and because they share the same enemy: a Kree named Ronan. You can guess the beats from there. Marvel isn't concerned with breaking formula. The movie is more about maximizing the effectiveness of the talent involved. Without question, that's what is done. This is the funniest of the Marvel movies, which is a credit to Pratt being cast in the lead and how ridiculous the premise is.
Elephant in the Room: Where's the names we know? The risk of this movie was always going to be that it is so far away from what people know. In general, the closer to Earth the superhero is, the easier it is for people to digest. Guardians is about a group of heroes that no casual fans know of, played by non A-list (currently) actors, in places most of us haven't heard of. Two things in particular make this movie easier to digest: 1) The humor. The movie is very aware that it's a tough sell and constantly addresses that by poking fun at it. 2) The soundtrack. No Marvel movie has this distinctive of a soundtrack. Using songs mostly from the 70s that people are very familiar with makes it all a lot more accessible. Kind of reminds me of A Knight's Tale in that sense, but it's fit into the story here very well.
To Sum Things Up:
Guardians of the Galaxy is a charming movie.Great characters, funny, simple plot, plenty of action. There's really not much to pick at. Be prepared for a bit of a vocabulary lesson at times. As far as franchise starters go, this is about as good as you could ask for. I can't wait to see how this fits into the larger universe from here.
Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend
Why I Saw It: At this point, if it's part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, I'm going to see it.
Cast: Winning. That's the best description I've found for the cast. Chris Pratt is a leading man in all the best ways. He brings all the Andy Dwyer likability you could want to Peter Quill and absolutely pulls off all the physicality of the role. Zoe Saldana has made a career out of roles like Gamora. I can't say how this is greatly different from The Losers or Columbiana. Then again, it doesn't need to be different. Somehow, they pull off Rocket Raccoon (voiced by Bradley Cooper) in a way that doesn't make him a joke, which is an achievement in and of itself. Dave Bautista is more than just "the strong guy" as Drax. He reminds me of The Rock with less smirking. Vin Diesel voices Groot, who I'd say is the fan favorite coming out the the movie. Lee Pace and Karen Gillan are the chief villains and do well in limited time. There are several others, including John C. Reilly, Glen Close, and Michael Rooker who are good as well.
Plot: This is the story of five galactic criminals who find themselves teaming up to save the galaxy. We begin with Peter Quill on Earth in 1988, featuring a rather heartbreaking origin story, before he's picked up by a space ship. Jump to the present and Quill is retrieving some sort of orb. He ends up in a prison, along with Gamora (after the orb), Rocket and Groot (after Quill), and Drax (after revenge). They end up bound together to split the bounty for this orb, which has greater significance than originally presented, and because they share the same enemy: a Kree named Ronan. You can guess the beats from there. Marvel isn't concerned with breaking formula. The movie is more about maximizing the effectiveness of the talent involved. Without question, that's what is done. This is the funniest of the Marvel movies, which is a credit to Pratt being cast in the lead and how ridiculous the premise is.
Elephant in the Room: Where's the names we know? The risk of this movie was always going to be that it is so far away from what people know. In general, the closer to Earth the superhero is, the easier it is for people to digest. Guardians is about a group of heroes that no casual fans know of, played by non A-list (currently) actors, in places most of us haven't heard of. Two things in particular make this movie easier to digest: 1) The humor. The movie is very aware that it's a tough sell and constantly addresses that by poking fun at it. 2) The soundtrack. No Marvel movie has this distinctive of a soundtrack. Using songs mostly from the 70s that people are very familiar with makes it all a lot more accessible. Kind of reminds me of A Knight's Tale in that sense, but it's fit into the story here very well.
To Sum Things Up:
Guardians of the Galaxy is a charming movie.Great characters, funny, simple plot, plenty of action. There's really not much to pick at. Be prepared for a bit of a vocabulary lesson at times. As far as franchise starters go, this is about as good as you could ask for. I can't wait to see how this fits into the larger universe from here.
Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend
Delayed Reaction: Six Days, Seven Nights
The Pitch: I have no idea how this movie was pitched. At all.
What Took Me So Long: This is always struck me as "generic romantic action comedy".
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) It's Harrison Ford right as he is in the twilight of his leading man in an action movie part of his career. There's Anne Heche being uptight. David Schwimmer being nervous. Jacqueline Obradors puts in time as the attractive native (at least, I think she was a native). It's not a very long movie and I appreciate that it didn't add needless filler.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: I'm not really sure what this movie is. There's a Romancing the Stone vibe yet a surprising amount of the movie follow Schwimmer. There's an element of running from pirates on the island but that doesn't take much time. This was completely absent of stakes. I did like seeing a pre-West Wing Allison Janney.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
What Took Me So Long: This is always struck me as "generic romantic action comedy".
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) It's Harrison Ford right as he is in the twilight of his leading man in an action movie part of his career. There's Anne Heche being uptight. David Schwimmer being nervous. Jacqueline Obradors puts in time as the attractive native (at least, I think she was a native). It's not a very long movie and I appreciate that it didn't add needless filler.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: I'm not really sure what this movie is. There's a Romancing the Stone vibe yet a surprising amount of the movie follow Schwimmer. There's an element of running from pirates on the island but that doesn't take much time. This was completely absent of stakes. I did like seeing a pre-West Wing Allison Janney.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
Saturday, August 2, 2014
Delayed Reaction: Fred Claus
The Pitch: What if Santa Claus had a brother?
What Took Me So Long: I've been burned before with Vince Vaughn Christmas movies.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) There's a number of good gags inherent to the premise. My favorite was the famous brother support group. Kids probably missed most of the humor in that but I liked it. Rachel Weisz got to use her actual accent. That was a nice surprise. I'd've assumed she'd be forced to American it up. Also, Elizabeth Banks was really hot as an elf. Is that weird?
Why I Wish I Hadn't: When Christmas movies try too hard, it gets really exhausting to watch. They had to work a bit too much to make this work. From the Claus clause about family members of saints freezing in age, to Fred's intricate trip to get to the North Pole on his own, to the Naughty/Nice paper work, there's so much of this that is working on explaining how this works. I think the movie's most direct comparison is Elf which is unfortunate for it because Elf is funnier and works a lot easier.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
What Took Me So Long: I've been burned before with Vince Vaughn Christmas movies.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) There's a number of good gags inherent to the premise. My favorite was the famous brother support group. Kids probably missed most of the humor in that but I liked it. Rachel Weisz got to use her actual accent. That was a nice surprise. I'd've assumed she'd be forced to American it up. Also, Elizabeth Banks was really hot as an elf. Is that weird?
Why I Wish I Hadn't: When Christmas movies try too hard, it gets really exhausting to watch. They had to work a bit too much to make this work. From the Claus clause about family members of saints freezing in age, to Fred's intricate trip to get to the North Pole on his own, to the Naughty/Nice paper work, there's so much of this that is working on explaining how this works. I think the movie's most direct comparison is Elf which is unfortunate for it because Elf is funnier and works a lot easier.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
Delayed Reaction: The Mexican
The Pitch: Brad Pitt is a really bad con man in over his head.
What Took Me So Long: I wasn't sure what to make of the movie. The title didn't tell me much.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) I like Brad Pitt, especially in comedies. I think he is a much better comedic actor than people give him credit for. Julia Roberts doesn't come off as all that different from Tess in Ocean's Eleven. James Gandolfini gets to play with and against type as a surprisingly funny gay hit man. I'm not entirely sure what the point of the movie was but it was fun to watch.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: As I said, I'm not totally sure what the point of the movie was. It was all-around odd yet pretty familiar.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
What Took Me So Long: I wasn't sure what to make of the movie. The title didn't tell me much.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) I like Brad Pitt, especially in comedies. I think he is a much better comedic actor than people give him credit for. Julia Roberts doesn't come off as all that different from Tess in Ocean's Eleven. James Gandolfini gets to play with and against type as a surprisingly funny gay hit man. I'm not entirely sure what the point of the movie was but it was fun to watch.
Why I Wish I Hadn't: As I said, I'm not totally sure what the point of the movie was. It was all-around odd yet pretty familiar.
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
Friday, August 1, 2014
Delayed Reaction: The X Files: Fight the Future
The Pitch: I wonder if this super-popular show will translate into a super popular movie?
What Took Me So Long: I've never watched the show, or at least much of it.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) I wanted to test how much of this movie works for non-fans of the series. I wanted to believe that I could follow it. That was a mistake. I'd like to have more to say about it but I have no idea what to say. David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson, expectedly, have great chemistry. I assume there's a lot to the plot that works with the show. I followed what was happening. At the same time, I was distinctly aware that there was a larger story being told. I liked Martin Landau. He isn't in the show is he?
Why I Wish I Hadn't: It isn't the movie's fault that I came in unprepared. How could I honestly speak ill or well of it?
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
What Took Me So Long: I've never watched the show, or at least much of it.
Why I Saw It: (Club 50) I wanted to test how much of this movie works for non-fans of the series. I wanted to believe that I could follow it. That was a mistake. I'd like to have more to say about it but I have no idea what to say. David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson, expectedly, have great chemistry. I assume there's a lot to the plot that works with the show. I followed what was happening. At the same time, I was distinctly aware that there was a larger story being told. I liked Martin Landau. He isn't in the show is he?
Why I Wish I Hadn't: It isn't the movie's fault that I came in unprepared. How could I honestly speak ill or well of it?
Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









