Formula: 12 Years a Slave + super powers
Harriet Tubman is a badass. There's no debating
that. She was an escaped slave who repeatedly went back down South, where she
risked being re-enslaved, so that she could free others. Even if you are
somehow pro-slavery, you'd have to admit that that took a lot of courage. On
the list of real life characters who deserve a reverent hero-worship movie,
Tubman ranks highly.
This is such a frustrating movie. The plot is what
you'd expect. It starts with Harriet as a slave in Maryland, establishing her
awful situation. It follows her on her lone trek North to freedom. She lives
comfortably for a while in Philadelphia before she's pulled back to Maryland by
her desire to free other slaves. As the laws get more severe and the slave
hunters get smarter, the difficulty of her job increases. They contrive a movie
structure onto the movie but that's pretty much all that happens. And that's
plenty.
What's frustrating is how unwilling the movie was to
let Harriet Tubman's actions speak loudest. This is a movie that's overly
concerned with getting applause breaks. Harriet speaks entirely in catch
phrases at certain points. This movie's idea of a good line is one that has to
be said with a pause and a close-up. Someone should've introduced them to the
Michael Bay Rule: One explosion is impactful. 100 explosions are
meaningless. I wish someone would've trusted Cynthia Erivo's performance to
win the audience rather than thinking they needed to give her a bunch of money
lines.
More egregious is that they give Harriet Tubman
superpowers. That's not a joke. Repeatedly in the movie Harriet has visions
that let her see into the future and save her from getting captured. I don't
care if this is even based on actual things that the real Harriet Tubman said.
It's a silly idea and undercuts Harriet Tubman's greatness. Do you know what
makes Harriet Tubman great? It's that she was brave and smart enough to
navigate slaves to freedom; not that she had visions. My irritation is best
summed up in a scene where Harriet and a group of slaves are cornered by some
men hunting them. Harriet has a vision and is told by god to cross a river. The
point in the rive she chooses is magically just shallow enough for her to walk
through it, then everyone follows. That scene sucks. You know what scene
would've be a testament to Harriet Tubman's greatness? The slave hunters think
they've outsmarted her and blocked the only bridge North. Then, it turns out
that Harriet is smart and good at her job and knows of a point in the river
they can cross to safety. The other slaves are scared. The river looks strong
and they don't know how to swim.Harriet tells them "Trust me". They
do, and she guides them to safety. Guess what? That makes Harriet even more
badass, doesn't rely on silly visions, and is probably a lot closer to being
historically accurate.
This movie tries way too hard to be a crowd-pleaser.
It forgets that the story is inherently crowd-pleasing. I understand that maybe
not everyone wants to see the wonky Underground Railroad movie about the minute
logistics of the system of slave liberation. I would've loved that movie, but
that isn't what they wanted to do. Instead, they wanted something more like the
Chadwick Boseman Thurgood Marshall movie from a couple years ago. They wanted
something a little more exaggerated to underscore the significance and power of
the lead character. I think they went too far though and cheapened the
character and story.
None of this falls on Cynthia Erivo. She's excellent
as Harriet Tubman. If she can manage an Oscar nomination from this, I won't
complain. Leslie Odom Jr. is incredibly likable as Harriet's Philadelphia
mentor. Joe Awlyn and Jennifer Nettles are appropriately detestable as
Harriet's former owners. Janelle Monae is nice in a 100% unnecessary role that
feels like it was created for her when she expressed interest in being in the
movie.
I'm being overly harsh on this movie, not because I
hated it, but because of how easily it could've been a movie I loved. Strong
cast. Inherently compelling story. It is just way over-executed. It underlines
points that are already in bold with an exclamation point.
Verdict: Weakly Recommend
No comments:
Post a Comment