A family going
through emotional hardships and a family going through financial hardships
clash after a pair of possible crimes lead to a deadly accident.
I don't know how
it works for other people, but I tend to categorize movies I need to see in my
mind into a few different groups:
- There are the "homework movies": Universally acclaimed classics. Despite my derogatory nickname, I end up liking these movies at a higher rate than my other categories.
- There are the "conversation movies": Popular or modern movies that I need to see so that I can take part in the larger pop culture discussion. That's entirely why I had my Club 50 project until a couple years ago.
- There are the "bad movies": movies I'm committed to seeing because I'm determined to see everything with Actress/Actor X (I've seen so many Rose Byne movie) in it, or some plot mechanic sounds really cool (Example: Phone Booth, Buried, Locke, or apparently anything set in a single location).
- Finally there are the "consensus movies": movies that, even if I don't hear people constantly gushing about them, I can never recall someone saying a bad thing about them.
And, it is a good
movie. I struggle to think of how someone could come away from it saying
"that's a bad movie". Granted, that's different from someone saying
"I didn't like it". I do understand those people. It's a movie about
some fairly unlikable people in a very unlikable situation. Nader (Payman
Maadi) and his wife, Simin (Leila Hatami), are splitting up. Nader employs a
woman to take care of his father with Alzheimers. She's not really equipped for
that kind of work. And she has an out-of-work husband* who is a bit of a loose
canon. This is a bad cocktail when you mix in the accident that ends with the
woman having a miscarriage. The drama of seeing how it all unfolds and trying
to sort out who deserves blame keeps the movie interesting throughout. Any
moderate fan of messy family dramas should really check this out.
*It's about here
that I'm going to admit that I lost track of all the names, and it could
probably be tied back to me being an entitled American in some way.
I will say that I
sided strongly with the Payman Maadi character. In addition to being our
primary POV character, it really felt like he was being charged with a crime
several levels above what he actually did. And the movie, without ever
explicitly siding with him, stacks the deck of circumstantial stuff on his
side. The woman he hires, Razieh (I looked it up), nearly killed his father by
tying him to the bed, there's something about missing money, she's being cagey
about why she disappeared, we see her having pains earlier, and we see the
steps she falls down being dirty or wet before the incident. Granted, I also
don't fully understand how the law works in Iran, so maybe I'm judging the
whole situation too much from an American legal perspective. Short of studying
Iranian law, I'm not sure how I could get around that. Nader's greatest sin is
his pride, which really makes a mess of things toward the end.
I'm not a huge fan
of the very end. Not because it's bad. In fact, it's emotionally wrecking and
beautifully acted. The way the daughter can't vocalize her choice of who she wants
to live with might be my favorite scene of the movie. And the credits playing
over the two parents silently sitting in the hall fits well for the title. The
story of the parents separating is secondary for most of the movie. Reshifting
the focus to that at the very end is an awkward fit. It's like looking at a
picture of a dog playing in a field then telling me that it's actually about
urban decay. Sure, that might be in there too, but pretending that it's the
main focus the whole time is a little disingenuous*. So, it's a good movie that
maybe doesn't all fit together perfectly.
*OK, here's a
better example. The Life of Pi (I'm sticking with the movie here)
opens by telling you it's a story that will make you believe in god. The bulk
of the movie is the story of a boy on a boat with a tiger (that might be a
metaphor) that really has nothing to do with that mission statement. Then it
ends pretending that it was about that all along. There's a disconnect between
the content and how the filmmaker interprets it.
Verdict: Weakly Recommend
No comments:
Post a Comment