*This hits a little close to home.
An obsessive number theorist discovers a number that
seemingly answers many of the big questions of the universe and other people
want to understand the number for their own purposes.
I'm not hip when it comes to talking about movies. I
like when a director has resources and knows what he/she is doing. I'm not the
guy who will look to the early movies and say "that's his best stuff,
before he was swallowed up by the big studios". I do like smaller, cheaper
movies, but there is a threshold where the lack of polish turns me off too
much. Christopher Nolan's Memento is right on that line. I really like
that movie, but I like his later stuff a lot more. Reservoir Dogs is
still my favorite Tarantino movie, but that's more about the bloat of his later
films than some belief in that movie's excellence. Besides, that movie looks
pretty good. Clerks is nice, but I'm inclined to watch Smith's later
movies more.
I've heard some people talk about Pi as
Darren Aronofski's best movie. I think that's rubbish. Pi is fine. It's
an interesting thriller. The central idea is pretty original. He skillfully
gets more tension out of the situation than the description - a mathematician
discovers a special number - suggests. This movie absolutely feels more like a
tryout for something bigger though. I get that using black and white is a nice
trick to keep the cost down. I don't think he would've shot it like that had
color been an adorable option. I don't think the black-and-white adds
anything special to this. The acting is fine, but it's also a case of him
making the most with who he could get. Often people, including myself, like to
romanticize the idea of filmmakers working around limitations. I think that's
only true to an extent. Pi is good, especially for what it cost, but I
much prefer watching an Aronofski movie when he has more resources.
Verdict: Weakly Don't Recommend
No comments:
Post a Comment