Thursday, June 30, 2016

July Movie Preview

It's been an awful quiet summer so far. The only movies so far to really blow up in the box office have been Civil War and Finding Dory. Civil War fell short of the Avengers movies though, so only Dory has been a resounding success. In terms of quality, it's been deflating. By this time last year, I already had Mad Max, Tomorrowland, and Me & Earl & the Dying Girl as top 10 locks for the year. I can't say that anything is comfortably in yet for 2016. Sadly, it's not looking like that will change with July. Hopefully I'm wrong.



2016
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June   
2015
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | Jul | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec 
2014
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2013
Mar |  Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec


7/1
The BFG
Working For It: It's Stephen Spielberg taking on a beloved children's book. It's got all sorts of agreeable faces like Mark Rylance, fresh off an Oscar win for his last Spielberg movie, Rebecca Hall, and Bill Hader (Some are giants. Some aren't. Other than Rylance, I'm not sure who's who). Few directors connect with childhood magic like Spielberg, so there's every reason to be excited about this.
Working Against It: Yet, I'm not all that excited about this. I'm sure it will be fine. For some reason, I can't get worked up for it. I wish there was something more concrete I could say than that.
Verdict: If I see this in theaters, it's a testament to how implicitly I trust the Disney machine.

The Legend of Tarzan
Working For It: As far as I can tell, this is a Tarzan movie in which Tarzan (Alexander Skarsgard) has alreadty been domesticated and has married Jane (Margot Robbie). Robbie is getting much more of the focus in the trailers, which has me excited about the character balance. I get the sense that Robbie isn't just playing a damsel in distress, which would be fantastic. I'm confused by the decision to keep Tarzan out of the jungle as much as the trailers imply, but I could see how it could work. While I'm not the biggest Christoph Waltz fan, he's a great pick for this kind of villain. This is David Yates' film follow-up after the last four Harry Potter movies, so I have no worries about if he can handle a big budget feature like this.
Working Against It: Margot Robbie is the only thing keeping this from being "generic action movie" for me. I've seen a number of previews and I still don't know what this movie is. Tarzan is already married to Jane. Waltz is using Jane to bait Tarzan. I guess Tarzan gets some animals to stampede a village. That's about all I know. I'm worried by that.
Verdict: If I see this in theaters, it's a testament to how implicitly I trust Margot Robbie.

The Purge: Election Year
Working For It: I refuse to give up on the idea that these movies could be good. I don't know why I stubbornly believe that. I just do. Frank Grillo is back, this time, he's protecting a politician (Elizabeth Mitchell) who wants to end the Purge. This looks very similar to The Purge: Anarchy except with raised stakes. I'm sure it will be about as good.
Working Against It: I can't be the only one who thinks the Purge would be scarier if they didn't address it as an actual political movement. It should just be a way of life. Introducing the idea that Mitchell's character wants to end it means that it would've had to be passed as a law in the first place, which it never would've. Sorry, I'll save further picking at it for my inevitable Delayed Reaction in about a year.
Verdict: If I see this in theaters, it's a testament to how bored I get that weekend.

Life, Animated [Limited]
Working For It: It's a documentary about an autistic kid who used Disney's animated movies as a way to understand human interaction. Look, call it "How Disney saved a life", because that's all I got from it and that's why it caught my interest. If I ever need something inspirational to pump my fist in the air to, this will be in consideration.
Working Against It: This really looks like one of those documentaries that only has about a half hour of interesting material that gets stretched to 90 minutes. I feel like even a 5 minute cut as an extended trailer would do the trick.
Verdict: I wouldn't see it in theaters even if I got the chance. I may look for it on Netflix.

7/8
Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates
Working For It: Anna Kendrick and Aubrey Plaza play slacker, stoner women who trick two brothers (Zac Efron and Adam Devine) into taking them to Hawaii for their sister's wedding. I just love the idea of Kendrick and Plaza getting to play really dirty characters. Plaza and Devine are old pros in comedy shows and movies. Kendrick and Efron are two actors who love getting to be funny. I'm a big fan of the whole quartet. And I can't wait to see how Sam Richardson, Kumail Nanjiani, and Stephen Root find ways to steal scenes.
Working Against It: The only thing I can say against this is that it shares an uncomfortable amount of DNA with Neighbors (Same screenwriters, Zac Efron, style of comedy) in a summer that just had a Neighbors sequel. I like Neighbors though, so hopefully it works as a supplement rather than cannibalizing the market.
Verdict: It's a complete lock that I see this. I love the cast too much not to.

The Secret Life of Pets
Working For It: Damn you, Illumination Entertainment! I was ready to ignore this, then you cast Louis C.K. as the voice of the lead dog in this film about what your pets are really doing when you're away. This is a voice cast of really funny people including C.K., Ellie Kemper, Eric Stonestreet, Kevin Hart, Lake Bell, Albert Brooks, Jenny Slate, and Hannibal Buress. Illumination and Dreakworks are both great at putting together voice casts that I would love to see together in a live-action movie. The previews have focused on all the side jokes as opposed to the main story, which is probably a wise move, since that's where its strength will lie.
Working Against It: Illumination Entertainment's history is this. Two Despicable Me movies (I hate the minions), Hop (forgettable), The Lorax (catchy songs, not great otherwise), and Minions (I hate the minions). In short, I'm still looking for a reason to like their product.
Verdict: Too many children in the theater. I don't dislike children, but they tend to take away from the viewing experience in too large of numbers.

Captain Fantastic [Limited]
Working For It: Viggo Mortensen is a father who has been raising his kids in the woods, away from civilization. When his wife/their mother dies, he's forced to introduce the children to the real world. It doesn't go smoothly. This has a nice dirty, indie vibe. Matt Ross from Silicon Valley wrote and directed this, so that aspect could be interesting.
Working Against It: I don't care much for movies that debate the merit of nature vs. civilization. Mortensen alone isn't enough to carry this for me.
Verdict: I don't like Aragorn that much.

Cell [Limited]
Working For It: John Cusack and Samuel L. Jackson team up for another Stephen King adaptation. This one is about all the cell phones in the world turning people into, zombies, I guess. The last time they teamed up that I remember was 1408 in 2007 which was pretty good. This could be as well.
Working Against It: I get when an art house film, a modest comedy, or even a slow burn drama gets held for limited release. Cell looks like a large scale thriller/action movie though. If it isn't getting a wide release, that's cause for concern.
Verdict: Why deprive myself from catching this at 3 A.M. on FX in a few years?


The Dog Lover [Limited]
Working For It: An attractive girl goes undercover at a puppy mill to expose something nefarious. I could name the cast, but that's not going to help.
Working Against It: I'm never going to see this. I just found the poster to be funny, so I kept it in the list.
Verdict: Hard no...Except, puppies...No! Hard no!

Men Go to Battle [Limited]
Working For It: A Civil War dark comedy about a kind of awkward man and his brother. I don't recognize the director or any of the actors, but I can't get the trailer out of my head.
Working Against It: While the tone of it is intriguing, it could also end up lifeless with no jokes that land right. It premiered during last year's film festival circuit and I'm only hearing about it now. That's a bad sign.
Verdict: I'm going to let this one find me. The ball is in your court, Netflix or HBO Go.

Norman Lear: Just Another Version of You [Limited]
Working For It: It seems like every few months another documentary comes out that looks back on the career of some icon. Brian de Palma had one recently, for example. A lot of the time, they wait until the person is dead. Lately, they've been picking live people so that they can interview them, which is a sound strategy. From the looks of it, Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady have assemble an impressive group of interviewees and Norman Lear has certainly done enough in his career to warrant this.
Working Against It: You know, I never cared for Lear's shows, and I think it's starting to reach a point where his significance is getting a little overstated. I'm probably wrong about that, but I don't really need to hear more about him.
Verdict: Only if I accidentally binge All in the Family, The Jeffersons, Good Times, Maude, and Archer Bunker's Place and want to know more.

Zero Days [Limited]
Working For It: Have you ever not wanted to do anything on a computer ever again? Well, the guy who brought you documentaries about Scientology, Enron, and Wikileaks is ready to take on the Stuxnet virus and how computers will lead to our eventual demise.
Working Against It: I'll be honest, when the computer apocalypse happens, I don't want to see it coming.
Verdict: I'd watch this if we were in the middle of a cyber attack worldwide and I wanted to know what was attacking us. Of course, in that scenario, I doubt I'd have access to a computer or a movie theater.

7/15
Ghostbusters
Working For It: The last time that Kristell Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, and Paul Feig all worked together was Bridesmaids. If that isn't enough for you, then we can't be friends. I'm mystified by the amount of uproar leading up to this movie. There's no reason for it. There just isn't. The worst-case scenario is that it will be forgettable. So, sit down, shut up, and enjoy the movie.
Working Against It: I mean, I guess you could not see it as some sort of a protest. That would kind of ignore the fact that the classic original movie was followed by an underwhelming sequel and mediocre animated series. It's not like someone is rebooting Citizen Kane.
Verdict: Absolutely seeing this.What's wrong with all of you haters?

The Infiltrator
Working For It: Bryan Cranston plays a U.S. Customs agent who goes undercover to stop Pablo Escobar's drug trade to the U.S. through Miami. It's a Brad Furman movie (The Lincoln Lawyer, Runner Runner) which means something to someone out there. I like seeing Cranston as a lead.
Working Against It: As much as I like Cranston, Diane Kruger, Amy Ryan, and Benjamin Bratt, I can't help but feel like this is a mid-level thriller at best. I'm not sure what new angle there is to cover in this story. Miami, Escobar, and the 1980s drug trade have been done to death.
Verdict: Probably not for a while, if ever.

Cafe Society [Limited]
Working For It: I believe this is Woody Allen's first movie from his deal with Amazon. It looks just like a Woody Allen movie which is a blessing and a curse. He has a new movie every year and they are rarely more than a couple steps away from being like the previous one. He's brought back Jesse Eisenberg and brought in people like Steve Carrell, Blake Lively, and Kristen Stewart. This one is a comedy about Hollywood during the Golden Age. It looks kind of similar to Hail, Caesar!
Working Against It: I always complain that Allen's movies tend to feel like first drafts (because he churns them out so quickly). My general rule is that I need to start hearing Oscar buzz or murmurs from friends before I bother.
Verdict: Too many other options in theaters. I assume that someday I'll work through his catalogue though, which would include this.

Phantom Boy [Limited]
Working For It: A GKIDS animated movie about a boy in a wheelchair who is able to leave his body and fight crime as a hero named Phantom Boy. This looks simple and sweet. I like the idea of a disabled superhero (of sorts).
Working Against It: The movie looks like it's targeted hard at kids, which makes sense, but also puts me squarely out of the demographic. I still haven't seen any GKIDS movies and do need to change that at some point.
Verdict: Realistically, I won't see this and will never look back.

Tulip Fever [Limited]
Working For It: Tom Stoppard's written another movie. That's always cause for excitment. This period piece about a wife having an affair behind her awful husband's back stars Alicia Vikander, Christoph Waltz, Dane DeHaan, Cara Delevingne, Holliday Granger, Zach Galifianakis (not a typo), and Judi Dench.
Working Against It: I think I'm supposed to love Tom Stoppard's writing a lot more than I do. Anna Karenina is an impressive practice in condensing source material down to something manageable. Shakespeare is Love is pleasant and a little overrated. Rosencrantz & Gildenstern Are Dead actually is pretty clever. Tulip Fever looks like Shakespeare in Love except played for fewer laughs.
Verdict: It's a lock that I'll see this eventually. I'm in no hurry.

7/22
Ice Age: Collision Course
Working For It: Not only is this franchise still going, but Continental Drift was the biggest movie in the series [for the rest of the world]. So, of course there would be another sequel. Thankfully, John Leguizamo, Ray Ramano, and Denis Leary aren't too busy to collect another check and the rest of that animated world is easy to populate. I'm curious to see how this one does.
Working Against It: They are painless movies to watch. There is no appeal to adults though (unlike a Pixar movie), so any time I'd see this in theaters, it would be in a theater full of children with parents who are mentally checked out. No thank you.
Verdict: Too many children in the theater and not enough reward

Lights Out
Working For It: I got a lot of It Follows vibes from the trailer. It's about a woman who can only be seen in the darkness and is terrorizing a mother and son. If the movie is willing to show any restraint, this could be really creepy. Otherwise, it'll be just a bunch of jump scares.
Working Against It: This is David Sandberg's debut feature. I recognize names like Teresa Palmer and Maria Bello. They aren't any immediate draws though. Oddly enough, with scary movies, the better that they can be presented in a trailer, the more I question how good they'll be. Here's a great test.
Verdict: I'm hoping to hear excellent reviews for this, because that will probably convince me to get to a theater.

Star Trek Beyond
Working For It: What happens when Star Trek meets The Fast and the Furious? It's time to find out. I have no idea what the story is. It has all the regulars back though (Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Simon Pegg - who helped write the screenplay, John Cho, Karl Urban, etc.) and Idris Elba is the villain (I think). That's all I need to know.
Working Against It: Star Trek Into Darkness was disappointing, so I worry about the direction of the franchise.
Verdict: Absolutely seeing it in theaters.

Don't Think Twice [Limited]
Working For It: I'm becoming a big Mike Bribiglia fan between his stand up and growing acting career. I was very impressed with his 2012 movie Sleepwalk With Me about his early days in stand up and battle with some crazy sleepwalking. Don't Think Twice is about an improv troupe instead and stars Keegan Michael Key, Gillians Jacobs, Kate Micucci, Tami Sagher, Chris Gethard, and Bribiglia. I'm not sure this has broad appeal but it is right in my wheelhouse.
Working Against It: It doesn't look like a particularly nuanced work. I imagine that other people may look at this as disposable the way that I do with movies about retirees who are trying to find romance in their lives again (I see you, Diane Lane).
Verdict: I doubt I'll get a chance to see it in theaters, but it's a lock that I will seek it out.

7/29
Bad Moms
Working For It: The Hangover writers have Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, and Kathryn Hahn as mothers who have had enough of bake sales and trying to do everything perfectly. It's a fun idea and completes the accidental trilogy of Bad Santa, Bad Teacher, and now Bad Moms (no connection between any of the creative teams). I'll happily watch those three ladies battle the PTA establishment.
Working Against It: As much as I like Kunis and Bell, I kind of worry that their comic sensibilities might overlap a bit too much. I'll happily be wrong about that though.
And the bra joke in the trailer would be a lot funnier it The Boss hadn't done exactly that already this year, and with Bell too.
Verdict: There's a lot I don't trust about this despite a lot of actresses I enjoy being in it. I assume I'll skip it in theaters.

Jason Bourne
Working For It: They stuck with that title because The Bourne Repetition wasn't testing well. Paul Greengrass made what most consider the best of the Bourne movies (Ultimatum) so it's good to have him back with Matt Damon. Bringing in Alicia Vikander and Tommy Lee Jones is also a good move. Keeping Julia Stiles around is nice to see (Why doesn't she work more?).
Working Against It: I'm not deeply invested in this series and The Bourne Legacy left an awful taste in my mouth. This is a return to what worked, but it might be too late.
Verdict: I'm pretty agnostic about the Bourne movies, but this still feels like a lock.

Nerve
Working For It: Emma Roberts and Dave Franco let the internet decide what they do for a night. As anyone who has been on the internet ever for even a minute already knows, that doesn't go well. It's from the directors of Catfish and Paranormal Activity 3 and 4, so expectations are all over the place. I'll admit, there's a high likelihood of me seeing this  for the two leads and all the "TV All Stars (Kimiko Glenn and Samira Wiley from Orange is the New Black, Emily Meade from The Leftovers, Miles Heizer from Parenthood).
Working Against It: I have a long history with movies that are so teenager that they are too teenage to teenager. I saw Project X and Project Almanac in theaters. Unfriended too. Studios keep trying to figure out a way to use the internet and recent technology in a way that appeals to young people without being awful. Mostly, they fail, but I'm kind of determined to be there when they finally succeed.  Nerve probably won't be the one to crack the code.
Verdict: This is the kind of movie I make time for in March. In the middle of Summer, that's doubtful.

Equity [Limited]
Working For It: This is basically a female Wolf of Wall Street starring Anna Gunn from Breaking Bad. There's less cursing I'm sure. I like the idea of telling a Wall Street story from a different perspective and it makes me happy to see Anna Gunn getting a lead role like this.
Working Against It: Based on the trailer, I don't see anything about this that I haven't seen before. It looks like a mash up of The Wolf of Wall Street, The Firm, and a season of Damages. None of those top any of my lists.
Verdict: No chance I'll see it in theaters. Modest chance I'll seek it out later.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Club 50 Wrap-Up: 1993

Years Completed:
1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1993 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 
1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 
2007 | 2008 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

The Wrap-Ups are slowing down at this point. I only have a handful of movies before I catch up entirely to the present. Given that these posts were always intended to be a reflection of a year that I've had enough time to digest, I'll be grinding to a virtual halt now. Hopefully that will leave me more refreshed so that these won't be a simple tally of sequels and Oscar results (although that will always be a part of this).

We sure did love courtroom dramas and corporate thrillers back in 1993, didn't we? The top ten alone has The Fugitive, The Firm, and The Pelican Brief. Indecent Proposal and In the Line of Fire aren't more than a step removed from those. Philadelphia and Rising Sun were up there too. Falling Down is similar in that it's an outright anti-corporate thriller. Whatever the case, it's readily apparent that the yuppie 80s were done and people plain didn't like businesses again.

This is an interesting period for comedy too. It was a period of deconstruction. Addams Family Values and Wayne's World 2 got even stranger than their predecessors. The Beverly Hillbillies continued the trend of taking known properties and showing how they are incompatible with the times. Last Action Hero was aggressively meta. Robin Hood: Men in Tights was Mel Brook's fastest turnaround for a parody (Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves came out only 2 years before). Mrs. Doubtfire and Dave mined new territory in the disguise-comedy sub-genre. I'll even credit Hot Shots: Part Deux for effectively going after Top Gun. And I nearly forgot Groundhog Day. What was that?

In terms of sequels, it's tough to count how many movies have had them. I count about 5. This all depends on how you count things like the Sandlot and Beethoven sequels. Also, I'm tempted to call U.S Marshalls and You've Got Mail sequels of The Fugitive and Sleepless in Seattle respectively. That would be cheating though. 6 of the movies that year were sequels. Five of them were sequels to comedies and the one that wasn't, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III, wasn't far off. I'm not sure what to make of that. It wasn't a big time for action franchises.

To wind down each year as I complete them, I'm going to hand out a few superlatives or anecdotal awards to highlight some of the highs and lows of the year's top 50 box office earners.

First Seen: Beethoven's 2nd
It's hard to know for sure, since I don't remember seeing anything in theaters. I do know that for one reason or another, I watched the shit out of this movie. I think I've maybe seen the first movie once. The 2nd though, probably dozens of times.

Last Seen: The Joy Luck Club
I am not the least bit surprised that I got to this last. I didn't know what that title meant. I think there's a strong chance I'll watch this again someday, which is more than I can say about most movies.

Happiest Surprise: Addams Family Values
I remember the first movie being amusing. This one is flat out hilarious. Everything at the summer camp is gold. This is a great example of using the groundwork established in the first movie to go even crazier rather than getting desperate by repeating the same jokes.

Biggest Disappointment: The Pelican Brief
The way that 30 Rock talked about it, I assumed it would be amazing. It was good. Damn unreasonable buildup of expectations.

Looked Better Then: In the Line of Fire
Does anyone actually remember this movie? It was the 7th highest grossing movie that year. I'll go ahead and say that other #7s like Total Recall, Die Hard, Jumanji have had much longer shelf-lives.

Looks Better Now: Groundhog Day
I could go a few ways with this. There's Jurassic Park. The box office results for Jurassic World prove that there's a lot of love still for the franchise. Then again, Park was already the highest grossing movie of 1993. Can it really look better? Hocus Pocus has a top tier position in early-millennial nostalgia. I'm going with Groundhog Day because it's a stone-cold classic. It's one of those movies like The Princess Bride and The Shawshank Redemption which just continues to stay relevant and beloved.

Favorite: Jurassic Park
This isn't the most complete movie on the list. In fact, it stumbles in a lot of places. This is all earned with the first T-Rex scene. That whole sequence is masterful. 

2nd Favorite: Groundhog Day
I nearly put this first because it is a special movie. I think it's telling that of all the movies Bill Murray is beloved for, Groundhog Day still shows up first on his IMDB page. It's a movie that has no business working, but totally does.

3rd Favorite: Mrs. Doubtfire
It's kind of a shame. This is a terrific movie, but the only thing that it's remembered for is the cross-dressing part.

Honorable Mention:
Schindler's List
I should put this higher, but I'm still reeling from the only time I've seen it.


Addams Family Values
Wednesday Addams is my spirit animal.

Cool Runnings
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up. It's bobsled time!
I'll be the first to admit that if I wasn't 6 when it came out, I probably wouldn't care that much about it. It's interesting to compare Disney's sports movies before and after Remember the Titans though.

Least Favorite: Hot Shots! Part Deux
If anyone is keeping track of my reactions and wrap-ups so far, this should be pretty obvious. I just don't find this at all funny in any way. It's lazy and hitting puchlines that are on a completely different frequency than what I respond. to.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Delayed Reaction: The Joy Luck Club

The Pitch: Chinese mothers live horrible lives so that their Chinese-American daughters can live less terrible lives.

How I Came Into It: I knew that I liked Ming-Na Wen from Agents of SHIELD. That's about it.

Why I Saw It: (Club 50) I had a strange reaction to watching this movie. I found that the more I thought about it after the fact, the more I liked it and what it did. The structure is simple but full. The performances are all solid, save a few moments of histrionics. If you asked me right after I watched this if I wanted to see it again, I would've told you "no". As time has passed, I'm thinking differently. I want at least a second viewing to better appreciate the shifting perspectives of the children and mothers.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: That said, I didn't particularly enjoy it as I was watching it, there's something to be said about that. It definitely has an "all men are evil" vibe that lacked nuance. There was a point to that though. Yeah, this is a curious case.

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend

Monday, June 27, 2016

Movie Reaction: Independence Day: Resurgence

Formula: Independence Day + Midichlorians

The closer it got to the release of Independence Day: Resurgence, I realized that everyone doesn't love the original movie. I can't blame them. It's cheesy as hell and full of holes. Ever since the highs of The Patriot and ID4, Roland Emmerich movies like The Day After Tomorrow and 2012 have underwhelmed while passion projects like Anonymous and Stonewall have perplexed. Emmerich's history of blowing everything up has really soured people on him, I've noticed.

I don't care. ID4 is one of the first "Event" movies I remember. It's when Will Smith became a star. The mix of action, humor, and cheesy heartstring tugging just works. I like the way it follows several different stories and has them all converge. It's just a movie that I really like.

ID4: Resurgence is a sequel that no one really asked for, but I was willing to welcome simply because I wanted to like it. And I did like it. I didn't love it. I liked it. This is a very flawed movie [which I'll get to in a moment]. It's also exactly what a sequel to ID4 would look like. It's big and bombastic. All sorts of things explode and get destroyed. The emotions are blunt and direct. The stakes are obvious and unsubtle. You can see where the money went on the screen, which is always nice. It's really hard to pick at anything in this movie without inviting the counter of "What else did you expect?"

Resurgence begins 20 years after the events of the first movie. Since the first alien attack, the world has been at peace. The alien technology has been mixed with our own to turn the very real world of 1996 into a Sci-Fi world of 2016. The movie quickly catches us up on all the major players from the original as well as the new characters. President Whitmore (Bill Pullman) is haunted by dreams about the aliens. David Levinson (Jeff Goldblum) is working with the U.N. investigating the aliens. Julius Levinson (Judd Hirsch) is on a boat. Patricia Whitmore (Maika Monroe, replacing Mae Whitman) is working as an aid for the president. She's engaged to Jake Morrison (Liam Hemsworth), an Air Force pilot working on the moon with his friend Charlie (Travis Trope). Charlie is infatuated with another pilot, Rain (Angelababy), who is part of a presidential legacy group led by Dylan Hiller (Jessie T. Usher). Dylan has had a national spotlight on him ever since his father, a worldwide hero, died in a test flight (an awkward but necessary way to write Will Smith out). And Dr. Okun (Brett Spiner) is still alive! He's been in a coma, but alive is alive. There's many more characters like Sela Ward as the President or Vivica A. Fox who is a nurse now. Well, anyway, on the 20th anniversary of the first attack, weird things start happening. Alien prisoners start going crazy. The alien ships start turning on. People who had close contact with the aliens start going insane. Guess what? The aliens are back and with a bigger ship and army than before. The world (but mostly America) must team up again to stop them.

The more I think about the movie, there's three things in particular that I must discuss to explain what isn't quite right about it.

1) Out with the old, in with the new
There are entirely too many characters to juggle. The model of the first movie worked because a bunch semi-random people stumble into one another and save the world. Resurgence doesn't have that freedom. It really wants to build up the young cast (who I am calling the Power Rangers*), but there's all these leftover characters that need attention too. Vivica A. Fox and Judd Hirsch have no significance, but they have to be fit it. President Whitmore is there because you have to have Bill Pullman. Jeff Goldblum is the only returning character who still feels vital. As a result of all this wasted time on the old, none of the Power Rangers feel all that fleshed out, even for a Roland Emmerich movie. Watching this reminds me how well The Force Awakens pulled off balancing the old with the new. It's harder than it looks.

*3 guys: two white (one a nerd), one black. 2 girls: one white, one Asian.

2) Rolland Emmerich: Future Theorist
This is a fundamentally different movie than the first. ID4 was about the real world being attacked by aliens. It was a disaster movie with a science fiction threat. Resurgence is a science fiction disaster movie. This isn't the real world and Roland Emmerich really isn't interested in this fake world. Normally, when a filmmaker sets a movie in the future like this, he/she has an idea for that future. There's something special about it and it's all in the details. Emmerich is kind of forced into making a future world in Resurgence and it shows. Nothing about the world is inspired. It feels like the least effort required and that permeates across the whole film. Basically, it all feels inauthentic.

3) Innocence Lost
ID4 is actually a really simple movie. Aliens visit Earth. People are intrigued by it until they attack. Humans fight back and luck into a victory. The most important thing about the movie is fighting aliens. It has some fun with Area 51 and it comes up only with enough answers to make the movie work. It's all very innocent. It's about discovery and piecing makeshift solutions together. Resurgence has the unenviable job of trying to create a mythology out of that. Again, that isn't something Roland Emmerich is all that interested in. He just wants aliens to attack again and plucky humans to stop them. Resurgence adds all this talk about queens and intergalactic wars and prophetic nightmares. The word that comes to mind is 'midichlorians'.
I heard a great story a while back that in some writers rooms for TV shows, whenever someone starts going way deeper into a story point than the audience ever needs to know, they use the shorthand of "midichlorians",  of course from the Star Wars prequels, as a way to shoot it down. Resurgence is filled with midichlorians and it kept reminding me that this was never meant to have a sequel. The best version of this movie would find a way to have aliens attack again without needing to know why. And I'll go ahead and say that they tease a third movie. I'm fascinated by the idea for it, because it looks like a completely different kind of movie that will probably be crazy and a complete mess.

Despite all the deep issues with the movie, I couldn't hate it. I love how much fun Roland Emmerich has creating meyhem. It isn't at all controlled. It's destruction for destruction's sake. But it comes from an authentic place. I'd rather have a Roland Emmerich or a Michael Bay blow stuff up in a movie than some director doing it for a paycheck, because Emmerich and Bay are having fun doing it which has a way of showing in the work.

There's some small notes in the film that I was impressed by. For example, there's a moment toward the middle when former President Whitmore drops from the demented state he's been in for most of the film to delivery an inspirational speech in the middle of an Air Force hanger. He's putting on a show, because he knows the importance giving people something to rally around. It's a clever moment that's both authentic and self-parody. Looking back at Emmerich's filmography (especially something like The Patriot), it's clear that he is interested in how heroes can be used as symbols to inspire. In fact, the one thing he really gets right about the world 20 years later is the reverence the world has for its heroes. Will Smith's Stephen Hiller is famous and revered, with portraits hung on walls and buildings taking his name. His son has a prestigious assignment because of the worldwide reverence for his father. David Levinson has a hard time getting his job done because he's being pulled in for ceremonies honoring his heroism. There's no fading into the sunset for these men. This is a world that knows who it owes thanks to.

I had a lot more to say about this movie than I realized. It's really not good enough to warrant this much discussion. It's a pretty standard disaster movie made under unusual circumstances. All around it falls short of the original but has enough of the same DNA to still be enjoyable.


Verdict (?): Weakly Don't Recommend

Sunday, June 26, 2016

Delayed Reaction: Dope

The Pitch: A geek in Inglewood has to become a drug dealer in order to get out of a jam.

How I Came Into It: Dope and Me & Earl & the Dying Girl were the two must-see movies that I heard about from Sundance in 2015. Dope snuck past me in theaters. As soon as I saw it online on Netflix, I made it appointment viewing*.

*And this is where I remind you that these Reactions are both "delayed" because they aren't movies I saw in theaters but also "delayed" because I don't get them out as soon as I see the movie.

Why I Saw It: Where to begin? This is a delightful movie. It's mostly a mix between a "coming of age" and an Odyssey story, which is in one of my sweet spots. The cast is excellent. I want Shameik Moore in all of the movies I see from now on. Kiersey Clemons has been showing up everywhere lately, and rightfully so. Same with Zoe Kravitz who has been gravitating around everything I see, it seems. It took me way too long to realize that Tony Revolori was the kid from The Grand Budapest Hotel. You can tell that everyone was fully engaged while they were making this and that's infectious.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: At some point, it got more complex than I cared about. The more that it got into only drug sales, bit coins, and blackmailing the guy he wants to get a recommendation letter from, the less interested I was. The scope of that outsized the rest of the movie. In the grand scheme of things though, complaining that I wanted more small character moments is an enviable criticism. Most movies, I beg for the plot to distract me from the thinly drawn characters.

Side Thought: Since seeing Dope, I've been bothered by a question: Why do I like Me & Earl & The Dying Girl more? Both movies are pretty similar. High school. Social reject as the lead. Quirky comedy. Detours into heady topics. They both rate in the 80s on Rotten Tomatoes.
I don't really have an answer. It's fun to examine though. There's level of familiarity to Me & Earl that gets me more. I'll be the first to admit that Inglewood and hip-hop aren't triggers to pull me in. That hasn't stopped me from liking other movies and shows though. Perhaps it's the stakes. Without the dying girl aspect at the end, I can't say that I'd like Me & Girl anywhere near as much. My best guess is that the plot intricacies turned me off more than I expected. I actually prefer the characters and main cast of Dope better (Sorry peripheral characters, but Connie Britton > Rick Fox). It'll be fun to re-examine this thought in the future.

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend


Delayed Reaction: Citizen Kane

The Pitch: Originally, it was something like "the story of William Randolph Hearst Charles Foster Kane's life told through interviews", but these days, it's more like "See why AFI keeps calling it the greatest movie ever made".

How I Came Into It: I went into watching this defensive. When so many people call something "the best" there's an inherent challenge to seeing it. You know, I'll be the judge of that. I've been aware of the movie ever since that episode of Tiny Toons and I was excited to finally get around to it.

Why I Saw It: Along with Gone with the Wind, Citizen Kane was one of my most glaring omissions on my movie list. I have to say, I really enjoyed it. I haven't seen enough older movies to put it in context in terms of influence and style, but it holds up remarkably well. There's nothing to say about it that hasn't been said already, so I'll keep it simple. Orson Welles is a force to be reckoned with and I love the style. Even knowing about Rosebud, the ending is still damn poignant.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: There is no reason to not see this movie. Ok, there is a reason. You could avoid it to be contrarian, like all those people who say "I haven't seen Star Wars" like they deserve a merit badge. There's no good reason to not see this movie.

Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend

Friday, June 24, 2016

Delayed Reaction: The Right Stuff

The Pitch: How did we get to the moon and would it make a good movie?

How I Came Into It: I've been itching to watch the HBO mini-series From the Earth to the Moon for a while and haven't wanted to commit the time to it. This seemed like a good alternative. Then I realized The Right Stuff is three hours long. Less of a commitment. Still intimidating. Regardless, I've only heard good things about it.

Why I Saw It: If nothing else, seeing this helped me get the rest of the homages in "Basic Rocket Science". It's long, but it's a very watchable 3 hours. It's full of likable performances from Sam Shepard, Dennis Quaid, Ed Harris, Fred Ward, and so many others. It's that style of movie, similar to Seabiscuit. It starts a little slow, but once it gets going, I'm having so much fun in the world with those characters, that it could go on as long as it wants. I can see why it's as highly regarded as it is.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: As I said, it is a little slow to start. That's all I've got.

Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend

Thursday, June 23, 2016

Delayed Reaction: The Raid: Redemption

The Pitch: Everyone is going to fight everyone.

How I Came Into It: Anecdotally, I remember it being at a local theater by me in 2011 for several weeks and having no idea what it was. I since learned that it is a highly regarded Indonesian martial arts action movie. Logical or not, what set me over the edge to finally see it was when the actors showed up in The Force Awakens. Make of that what you will. I knew that structurally, the movie Dredd is virtually the same thing. I liked Dredd. I would probably like this.
Oh, I nearly forgot. The director of this directed that insane cult story from the second V/H/S movie. So, yes, please.

Why I Saw It: This was a lot of fun. It's "Fight Choreography: The Movie", and that choreography is some of the best I've ever seen. Everything else about the story is as lean as possible. That commitment to one thing really works in this case. I can't wait to see the next one.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: The movie takes a while to get going. A lot of that is done on purpose in order to set the stakes and build the tension, so I can forgive it. Let me put it this way though. If I watch this again, I'll probably skip the first few chapters.

Verdict (?): Strongly Recommend

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Delayed Reaction: The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance

The Pitch: John Ford wants to make another western. Someone call John Wayne. And let's see if Jimmy Stewart is busy.

How I Came Into It: The number of old westerns, John Wayne movies, Jimmy Stewart movies, or John Ford movies I've seen is pathetic. I went looking for The Searchers* and found this instead. I've heard great things about both.

*Thanks, Disney's The Great Movie Ride.

Why I Saw It: I love what this has to say about building a myth. I have to believe the line that inspired the rest of the movie was "when legend becomes fact, print the legend". Not everything about this has aged well, but the core still works very well. Sadly, I had the twist spoiled for me beforehand. That didn't change the effectiveness of it though. The movie even finds a way to make voting for representatives interesting.

Why I Wish I Hadn't: I won't say that it has pacing issues, but it's definitely hard to adapt to the pace of it all. Mostly, I wish I would've kept a tally of the number of times John Waynes says "pilgrim".

Verdict (?): Weakly Recommend

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Club 50 Wrap-Up: 2000

Years Completed:
1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 
1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 
2007 | 2008 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

I'm officially exhausted. I know these Delayed Reactions and Wrap-Ups have been coming out at a slowish rate, but, without getting too much into how the sausage is made, I've been doing nothing but writing these Wrap Ups for a few weeks now*. I'm finally on the last one I'll be doing for at least a month or so.

*"Now" actually being sometime in February, because I can do these posts ahead of time and I watch too many movies  for this "one post a day" strategy to not get backed up.

It's appropriate that I end this phase on 2000. I discussed this before, but 2000 always struck me as a transition year. Just looking at the top grossing movies of the years before and after sums it up well. Before 2000, it was movies like Titanic, Saving Private Ryan, and Star Wars. Huge movies. Epic historical and fantasy stories. After 2000, it was Harry Potter, Spider-Man, and Lord of the Rings. Similarly huge movies. 2000's highest grossing movie was How the Grinch Stole Christmas. That's a head scratcher. It's not a bad movie, but it isn't even considered a Christmas classic these days. I still find it most notable for how long Taylor Momsen has been around (but that's just me).

That's not to say it was a lost year. It's just a quieter year. There were six sequels in the top 50 (There's been at least 9 in every year since). These weren't impressive movies though. We're talking about the unneeded Nutty Professor sequel. Scream 3, which took the air out of the franchise entirely. Rugrats in Paris felt excessive and Mission Impossible II is easily the weakest installment in the series. There's been a fairly average number of sequels to the movies released in 2000 (13). Most have been comedies though, with Scary Movie, Big Momma's House, Miss Congeniality, and The Whole Nine Yards getting sequels among others.

This is the rare year in which all the Oscar nominees made the top 50 in the box office. In fact, four of them were in the top 15 (Gladiator #4, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon #12, Erin Brockovich #13, Traffic #15). Even Chocolat at #32 was safely in there.

To wind down each year as I complete them, I'm going to hand out a few superlatives or anecdotal awards to highlight some of the highs and lows of the year's top 50 box office earners.

First Seen: X-Men
This is one of my favorite memories seeing a movie. I saw it with my dad (which I don't do often anymore. I should change that). I was still young enough for it to feel like an event. And it was a late showing. At least 9, but probably closer to 10. I have the feeling like it was a spur of the moment idea. My dad liked Marvel comics from when he was younger. We had no idea what to expect, because superhero movies were still a DC thing. Beyond being impressed by the final product, it was the first time I remembered being "sequeled at". It was so obvious that they were gunning for a sequel with all the loose ends that they even pointed them out.

Last Seen: The Cell
That was a weird movie. I can't say I avoided seeing it. I also won't say I went out of my way to find it.

Happiest Surprise: Disney's The Kid
This is exactly the kind of movie that I have a soft spot for. For the same reasons that I liked The Kid, I almost put The Family Man here instead. There's something about the moment at the end when Bruce Willis and Spencer Breslin meet their future self and say "we're gonna be a pilot" that is so incredibly sweet.

Biggest Disappointment: Scream 3
This series certainly limped to the end. That is, until it came back with Scream 4 a decade later, which was better than I expected.

Looked Better Then: What Women Want
I'm tempted to choose Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon for the rate at which it went from visual marvel to parodied. At this point, most people remember it more as a joke than a movie, which is a shame. I'll stick with What Women Want for the Mel Gibson/scorched Earth of it all. I don't know. He just doesn't seem as sweet anymore.

Looks Better Now: Remember the Titans
X-Men is probably the most influential movie in that its success arguably accounted for at least one top 13 movie in the box office every year from 2002 to the present*. Before that, there was what, Blade? I also strongly considered Bring It On and Miss Congeniality since both are comedies that I've watched countless times and still love. Remember the Titans is the easy pick though. The way people talk about that these days, you'd think it made $200 million, and swept the Oscars, not that it did slightly worse than Big Momma's House and it lost that Black Reel Award for Best Film.

*In case you were wondering, I'm referring to:
2002: Spider-Man (#1)
2003: X2: X-Men United (#6), Hulk (#14)
2004: Spider-Man 2 (#2)
2005: Fantastic Four (#13)
2006: X-Men: The Last Stand (#4)
2007: Spider-Man 3 (#1)
2008: Iron Man (#2)
2009: X-Men Origins: Wolverine (#13)
2010: Iron Man 2 (#3)
2011: Thor (#10), Captain America: The First Avenger (#12)
2012: Marvel's The Avengers (#1), The Amazing Spider-Man (#7)
2013: Iron Man 3 (#2), Thor: The Dark World (#12)
2014: Guardians of the Galaxy (#3), Captain America: The Winter Soldier (#4), X-Men: Days of Future Past (#9), The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (#12)
2015: Avengers: Age of Ultron (#3), Ant-Man (#13)

Favorite: Bring It On
I wasn't kidding. I love this movie. USA Network used to always do the double feature of Bring It On and Ten Things I Hate About You and I called it "my afternoon killer". If those were on, it was automatic.

2nd Favorite: Gladiator
I love a good historical sword and shield epic. I'll take Maximus fighting with lions and an insane Joaquin Phoenix, before we knew that he actually might be insane, over just about anything.

3rd Favorite: The Patriot
I like The Patriot for a lot of the same reasons I like Gladiator. Throw in Heath Ledger and I'm not actually sure why I have this below Gladiator. I must really love Roman architecture.

Honorable Mention:
X-Men
The more I learn about the development of this movie, the more interesting it is. Brian Singer had to fight to get it made the way he wanted and didn't win all those battles. The final result is still pretty impressive. And it gave us all Hugh Jackman.

Miss Congeniality
Sandra Bullock is delightful. That is all.


Remember the Titans
Whenever I complain about a historical inspirational sports movie being formulaic, what I'm really saying is "Remember the Titans did this better".

Least Favorite: Scary Movie
I realize this is the best movie in the franchise. Even still, I loathe it. It's lazy comedy that I don't find funny.